Circuit stability theory for non-Foster circuits

S. D. Stearns
{"title":"Circuit stability theory for non-Foster circuits","authors":"S. D. Stearns","doi":"10.1109/MWSYM.2013.6697633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The successful design of non-Foster circuits requires tests for stability that are accurate and reliable. It is widely known by designers of amplifiers and active circuits that popular tests for the stability of 2-port and n-port circuits can give incorrect results. Despite periodic debate over the past 50 years, the validity of Rollett's K-factor test has never been proved mathematically; it was argued only on physical grounds. We present linear non-Foster circuits that serve as explicit counterexamples to Rollett's test. One counterexample circuit is given that is unconditionally stable according to the full statement of Rollett's test including Rollett's proviso. Yet the circuit is provably unstable with simple resistive termination, in direct contradiction of Rollett. A second counterexample circuit is shown that gives the stronger result that Rollett's test cannot be repaired, and indeed many other stability tests are defective too. Armed with these results, a different approach to the design of stable circuits is discussed that has enabled us to build stable non-Foster antenna impedance matching circuits. An example of a stable non-Foster broadband impedance matching circuit for a small loop antenna is given. The design of the circuit was made possible by using a new capability available in certain circuit EDA CAD tools.","PeriodicalId":128968,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (MTT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MWSYM.2013.6697633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

The successful design of non-Foster circuits requires tests for stability that are accurate and reliable. It is widely known by designers of amplifiers and active circuits that popular tests for the stability of 2-port and n-port circuits can give incorrect results. Despite periodic debate over the past 50 years, the validity of Rollett's K-factor test has never been proved mathematically; it was argued only on physical grounds. We present linear non-Foster circuits that serve as explicit counterexamples to Rollett's test. One counterexample circuit is given that is unconditionally stable according to the full statement of Rollett's test including Rollett's proviso. Yet the circuit is provably unstable with simple resistive termination, in direct contradiction of Rollett. A second counterexample circuit is shown that gives the stronger result that Rollett's test cannot be repaired, and indeed many other stability tests are defective too. Armed with these results, a different approach to the design of stable circuits is discussed that has enabled us to build stable non-Foster antenna impedance matching circuits. An example of a stable non-Foster broadband impedance matching circuit for a small loop antenna is given. The design of the circuit was made possible by using a new capability available in certain circuit EDA CAD tools.
非福斯特电路的电路稳定性理论
非福斯特电路的成功设计需要精确可靠的稳定性测试。放大器和有源电路的设计者普遍知道,常用的2端口和n端口电路稳定性测试可能会给出不正确的结果。尽管在过去的50年里有周期性的争论,但Rollett的k因子检验的有效性从未在数学上得到证明;争论的理由仅仅是物理上的。我们提出线性非福斯特电路,作为明确的反例罗利特的检验。根据包含罗利特条件的罗利特检验的完整陈述,给出了一个无条件稳定的反例电路。然而,简单的电阻端接证明电路是不稳定的,这与罗利特的直接矛盾。第二个反例电路给出了更强的结果,即罗利特的测试不能被修复,实际上许多其他稳定性测试也有缺陷。有了这些结果,我们讨论了一种设计稳定电路的不同方法,使我们能够构建稳定的非福斯特天线阻抗匹配电路。给出了一种用于小环形天线的稳定非福斯特宽带阻抗匹配电路。通过使用某些电路EDA CAD工具中的新功能,电路的设计成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信