A Portfolio Approach to Accelerate Therapeutic Innovation in Ovarian Cancer

Shomesh E. Chaudhuri, Katherine A. Cheng, A. Lo, S. Pepke, Sergio Rinaudo, L. Roman, R. Spencer
{"title":"A Portfolio Approach to Accelerate Therapeutic Innovation in Ovarian Cancer","authors":"Shomesh E. Chaudhuri, Katherine A. Cheng, A. Lo, S. Pepke, Sergio Rinaudo, L. Roman, R. Spencer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3286330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biomedical innovation in oncology has become riskier and more expensive, precipitating a withdrawal of private sector funding from the sector. In this article, we consider a portfolio-based approach to funding in which multiple distinct ovarian cancer treatment candidates are funded within a single structure. Twenty-five potential early-stage drug development projects were identified for inclusion in a hypothetical portfolio through interviews with gynecological oncologists and leading experts, a review of ovarian cancer-related trials registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database, and an extensive literature review. The annualized returns of this portfolio were simulated under a purely private sector structure both with and without partial funding from philanthropic grants, and a public-private partnership that included government guarantees. We find that public-private structures of this type can increase expected returns and reduce tail risk, allowing greater amounts of private sector capital to fund early-stage research and development.","PeriodicalId":335359,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3286330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Biomedical innovation in oncology has become riskier and more expensive, precipitating a withdrawal of private sector funding from the sector. In this article, we consider a portfolio-based approach to funding in which multiple distinct ovarian cancer treatment candidates are funded within a single structure. Twenty-five potential early-stage drug development projects were identified for inclusion in a hypothetical portfolio through interviews with gynecological oncologists and leading experts, a review of ovarian cancer-related trials registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database, and an extensive literature review. The annualized returns of this portfolio were simulated under a purely private sector structure both with and without partial funding from philanthropic grants, and a public-private partnership that included government guarantees. We find that public-private structures of this type can increase expected returns and reduce tail risk, allowing greater amounts of private sector capital to fund early-stage research and development.
加速卵巢癌治疗创新的组合方法
肿瘤学领域的生物医学创新已变得风险更大、成本更高,促使私营部门从该领域撤出资金。在本文中,我们考虑了一种基于投资组合的资助方法,其中多种不同的卵巢癌治疗候选药物在单一结构中获得资助。通过与妇科肿瘤学家和主要专家的访谈、对ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中注册的卵巢癌相关试验的回顾以及广泛的文献回顾,确定了25个潜在的早期药物开发项目,并将其纳入假设的投资组合。这个投资组合的年化回报是在一个纯私营部门结构下模拟的,包括有和没有部分来自慈善捐赠的资金,以及包括政府担保的公私合作伙伴关系。我们发现,这种类型的公私结构可以增加预期回报,降低尾部风险,允许更多的私营部门资本资助早期研究和开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信