The Tension Between Transparency and Public Appeasement in the Formulation of Wildfire Management Strategies and the Use of Wildfire as a Restoration Tool

Rachael E. Salcido
{"title":"The Tension Between Transparency and Public Appeasement in the Formulation of Wildfire Management Strategies and the Use of Wildfire as a Restoration Tool","authors":"Rachael E. Salcido","doi":"10.37419/twjrpl.v1.i1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I explore how the Healthy Forests Restoration Act 2003 (\"HFRA\") and development of a National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy pursuant to the Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement Act 2009 (\"FLAME\") purchased peace with WUI landowners. These laws emphasized \"fire-adapted communities\" and potentially signaled acceptance of (or normalizing) development in areas of high fire danger. By emphasizing risk reduction narrowly, we may have missed an opportunity to advance broader restoration objectives connected to bringing fire back to fire-adapted landscapes.","PeriodicalId":394996,"journal":{"name":"Texas Wesleyan Journal of Real Property Law","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Texas Wesleyan Journal of Real Property Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37419/twjrpl.v1.i1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay I explore how the Healthy Forests Restoration Act 2003 ("HFRA") and development of a National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy pursuant to the Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement Act 2009 ("FLAME") purchased peace with WUI landowners. These laws emphasized "fire-adapted communities" and potentially signaled acceptance of (or normalizing) development in areas of high fire danger. By emphasizing risk reduction narrowly, we may have missed an opportunity to advance broader restoration objectives connected to bringing fire back to fire-adapted landscapes.
在野火管理策略的制定和使用野火作为恢复工具的透明度和公众绥靖之间的紧张关系
在这篇文章中,我探讨了2003年健康森林恢复法案(“HFRA”)和根据2009年联邦土地援助、管理和增强法案(“FLAME”)制定的国家凝聚力野火管理战略是如何与WUI土地所有者和平相处的。这些法律强调“适应火灾的社区”,并可能表明接受(或正常化)在火灾高风险地区的发展。通过狭隘地强调降低风险,我们可能错过了推进更广泛的恢复目标的机会,这些目标与将火灾带回适应火灾的景观有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信