Relevance, Representation, and Responsibility: Exploring World Language Teachers’ Critical Consciousness and Pedagogies

L2 Journal Pub Date : 2020-09-16 DOI:10.5070/L212246037
H. Baggett
{"title":"Relevance, Representation, and Responsibility: Exploring World Language Teachers’ Critical Consciousness and Pedagogies","authors":"H. Baggett","doi":"10.5070/L212246037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Baggett, Hannah Carson | Abstract: Critical pedagogical work hinges upon teachers’ critical consciousness about students’ identities that constitute ‘diversity’ and how they are situated within systems of oppression and privilege. In this study, survey data were collected from practicing world language teachers’ (WLTs) to explore their beliefs about the extent to which dimensions of students’ identities played a role in their language teaching practices. Additionally, these data captured their beliefs about the extent to which teachers, administrators, curriculum developers, and schools should be responsible for addressing identity dimensions, such as ethnoracial status, gender, socioeconomic status, and faith. Results from cluster analyses indicated that teachers’ orientations varied systematically: a first belief orientation locates neither teachers nor schools as responsible, and that student ‘diversity’ may be irrelevant to education; a second orientation locates both teachers and schools as having shared responsibility, but that some identities might be irrelevant to teaching and learning; a third orientation wherein teachers viewed some identity dimensions as more relevant to their teaching practices than others, suggesting that, although teachers may be critically conscious about identity, that consciousness may not translate to critical pedagogical practices; and a last orientation that suggests critically conscious language teachers who also endorse learner-centered teaching practices. Findings from this study illuminate new theoretical and conceptual spaces about WLTs’ sense of responsibility and advocacy for both students and the ways they position their classrooms as sites of critical pedagogies. These findings have implications for teacher leaders and teacher educators as they work to build teacher capacities for engaging in critical pedagogies that examine systems of oppression and privilege in language classrooms.","PeriodicalId":328034,"journal":{"name":"L2 Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"L2 Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/L212246037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Author(s): Baggett, Hannah Carson | Abstract: Critical pedagogical work hinges upon teachers’ critical consciousness about students’ identities that constitute ‘diversity’ and how they are situated within systems of oppression and privilege. In this study, survey data were collected from practicing world language teachers’ (WLTs) to explore their beliefs about the extent to which dimensions of students’ identities played a role in their language teaching practices. Additionally, these data captured their beliefs about the extent to which teachers, administrators, curriculum developers, and schools should be responsible for addressing identity dimensions, such as ethnoracial status, gender, socioeconomic status, and faith. Results from cluster analyses indicated that teachers’ orientations varied systematically: a first belief orientation locates neither teachers nor schools as responsible, and that student ‘diversity’ may be irrelevant to education; a second orientation locates both teachers and schools as having shared responsibility, but that some identities might be irrelevant to teaching and learning; a third orientation wherein teachers viewed some identity dimensions as more relevant to their teaching practices than others, suggesting that, although teachers may be critically conscious about identity, that consciousness may not translate to critical pedagogical practices; and a last orientation that suggests critically conscious language teachers who also endorse learner-centered teaching practices. Findings from this study illuminate new theoretical and conceptual spaces about WLTs’ sense of responsibility and advocacy for both students and the ways they position their classrooms as sites of critical pedagogies. These findings have implications for teacher leaders and teacher educators as they work to build teacher capacities for engaging in critical pedagogies that examine systems of oppression and privilege in language classrooms.
关联、表征与责任:世界语言教师的批判意识与教学法探析
摘要:批判性教学工作取决于教师对构成“多样性”的学生身份以及他们如何处于压迫和特权体系中的批判性意识。本研究收集了世界语言教师的调查数据,以探讨他们对学生身份维度在其语言教学实践中发挥作用的程度的看法。此外,这些数据还反映了他们对教师、管理人员、课程开发人员和学校应该在多大程度上负责解决身份问题(如种族地位、性别、社会经济地位和信仰)的看法。聚类分析结果表明,教师的取向存在系统性差异:第一信仰取向既不认为教师有责任,也不认为学校有责任,学生的“多样性”可能与教育无关;第二种倾向认为教师和学校都有共同的责任,但有些身份可能与教与学无关;第三个方向,教师认为某些身份维度比其他维度更与他们的教学实践相关,这表明,尽管教师可能对身份具有批判性意识,但这种意识可能不会转化为批判性的教学实践;最后一个方向是具有批判性意识的语言教师,他们也支持以学习者为中心的教学实践。这项研究的发现阐明了新的理论和概念空间,即wlt对学生的责任感和倡导,以及他们将课堂定位为批判性教学法的场所的方式。这些发现对教师领导和教师教育者具有启示意义,因为他们致力于建立教师参与批判性教学法的能力,以检查语言课堂中的压迫和特权系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信