Barriers and Opportunities for Workplace Violence Interventions in Australian Paramedicine: A Qualitative Study

Brodie Thomas, P. O'Meara, K. Edvardsson, E. Spelten
{"title":"Barriers and Opportunities for Workplace Violence Interventions in Australian Paramedicine: A Qualitative Study","authors":"Brodie Thomas, P. O'Meara, K. Edvardsson, E. Spelten","doi":"10.33151/ajp.17.817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Workplace violence directed at paramedics by patients and bystanders is a persistent and pervasive issue. There is little available evidence supporting the effectiveness of current interventions in the paramedicine context. No studies have reported on potential barriers and there is little evidence supporting opportunities for more effective interventions. The objective of this study was to make an inventory of current workplace interventions and explore the barriers and opportunities for these interventions as perceived by paramedics. Methods Ten paramedics were interviewed about their experiences and insights into workplace violence. The interview data underwent thematic and narrative analysis. Results Seven interventions were highlighted, 10 barriers and 12 opportunities for current and future workplace violence interventions were discussed. The majority of the barriers related to culture in society, attitudes of staff, and lack of capacity for the ambulance service to take action following violent events. The opportunities raised included co-design of interventions, culture change for paramedics and communities, accountability for paramedics and perpetrators of violence, increased ambulance service options following violent events, and improving feedback to staff. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that interventions are likely to be more effective and sustainable if they are evidence-based, co-designed, address all levels of healthcare, and evaluated. Important areas for future research include a focus on consequences and accountability for perpetrators and strategies for ambulance services and paramedics to participate in public health approaches to reducing violence in communities.","PeriodicalId":340334,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","volume":"11 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33151/ajp.17.817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Introduction Workplace violence directed at paramedics by patients and bystanders is a persistent and pervasive issue. There is little available evidence supporting the effectiveness of current interventions in the paramedicine context. No studies have reported on potential barriers and there is little evidence supporting opportunities for more effective interventions. The objective of this study was to make an inventory of current workplace interventions and explore the barriers and opportunities for these interventions as perceived by paramedics. Methods Ten paramedics were interviewed about their experiences and insights into workplace violence. The interview data underwent thematic and narrative analysis. Results Seven interventions were highlighted, 10 barriers and 12 opportunities for current and future workplace violence interventions were discussed. The majority of the barriers related to culture in society, attitudes of staff, and lack of capacity for the ambulance service to take action following violent events. The opportunities raised included co-design of interventions, culture change for paramedics and communities, accountability for paramedics and perpetrators of violence, increased ambulance service options following violent events, and improving feedback to staff. Conclusion The findings of this study suggest that interventions are likely to be more effective and sustainable if they are evidence-based, co-designed, address all levels of healthcare, and evaluated. Important areas for future research include a focus on consequences and accountability for perpetrators and strategies for ambulance services and paramedics to participate in public health approaches to reducing violence in communities.
澳大利亚医务人员对工作场所暴力干预的障碍和机会:一项定性研究
病人和旁观者针对护理人员的工作场所暴力是一个持续和普遍的问题。很少有证据支持当前干预措施在辅助医学领域的有效性。没有关于潜在障碍的研究报告,也没有证据支持有机会采取更有效的干预措施。本研究的目的是对目前的工作场所干预措施进行盘点,并探讨护理人员认为这些干预措施的障碍和机会。方法对10名护理人员进行访谈,了解他们对工作场所暴力的经历和见解。对访谈数据进行主题和叙事分析。结果总结了7项干预措施,讨论了当前和未来职场暴力干预的10个障碍和12个机会。大多数障碍与社会文化、工作人员的态度以及救护车服务在暴力事件发生后缺乏采取行动的能力有关。提出的机会包括共同设计干预措施、改变护理人员和社区的文化、对护理人员和暴力施暴者问责、增加暴力事件后的救护车服务选择,以及改善对工作人员的反馈。结论本研究的结果表明,如果干预措施是循证的,共同设计的,涉及所有层次的医疗保健,并进行评估,可能会更有效和可持续。未来研究的重要领域包括关注肇事者的后果和问责,以及救护车服务和护理人员参与减少社区暴力的公共卫生办法的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信