ESG Investing: Conceptual Issues

Bradford Cornell
{"title":"ESG Investing: Conceptual Issues","authors":"Bradford Cornell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3621163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using criteria based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations has become an increasingly important aspect of investment decision making, particularly for high-profile institutional investors. As of 2019, sustainable assets under management were estimated to be $30 trillion worldwide. The claim here is that the enthusiasm for ESG investing has been exaggerated for three reasons. First, it is not clear what constitutes an ESG investment in the context of a complex, integrated economy. Second, the impact on investment performance of a preference for ESG investments has not been sufficiently recognized outside academic circles. Finally, many leading practitioners have stated that the importance of ESG considerations implies that the corporate objective of maximizing shareholder value, which lies at the core of much of finance theory, is outdated and needs to be replaced by a more comprehensive stakeholder model. The conclusion is that both the benefits of the traditional model and the dangers of a broader stakeholder model have not be adequately appreciated. TOPICS: ESG investing, portfolio construction, wealth management Key Findings • Investors need to recognize that a lower cost of capital for firms with high ESG scores means lower expected returns for investors. • Returns realized as the market comes to recognize highly rated ESG companies are not indicative of long-run expected returns. • ESG policies, such as a carbon tax, need to be set by elected officials, not corporate executives who have neither the proper training nor the proper incentives.","PeriodicalId":175460,"journal":{"name":"The journal of wealth management","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of wealth management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3621163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Using criteria based on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations has become an increasingly important aspect of investment decision making, particularly for high-profile institutional investors. As of 2019, sustainable assets under management were estimated to be $30 trillion worldwide. The claim here is that the enthusiasm for ESG investing has been exaggerated for three reasons. First, it is not clear what constitutes an ESG investment in the context of a complex, integrated economy. Second, the impact on investment performance of a preference for ESG investments has not been sufficiently recognized outside academic circles. Finally, many leading practitioners have stated that the importance of ESG considerations implies that the corporate objective of maximizing shareholder value, which lies at the core of much of finance theory, is outdated and needs to be replaced by a more comprehensive stakeholder model. The conclusion is that both the benefits of the traditional model and the dangers of a broader stakeholder model have not be adequately appreciated. TOPICS: ESG investing, portfolio construction, wealth management Key Findings • Investors need to recognize that a lower cost of capital for firms with high ESG scores means lower expected returns for investors. • Returns realized as the market comes to recognize highly rated ESG companies are not indicative of long-run expected returns. • ESG policies, such as a carbon tax, need to be set by elected officials, not corporate executives who have neither the proper training nor the proper incentives.
ESG投资:概念问题
使用基于环境、社会和治理(ESG)考虑的标准已成为投资决策中越来越重要的方面,特别是对知名机构投资者而言。截至2019年,全球管理的可持续资产估计为30万亿美元。这里的观点是,对ESG投资的热情被夸大了,原因有三。首先,在复杂、一体化的经济背景下,不清楚什么是ESG投资。其次,在学术界之外,对ESG投资偏好对投资绩效的影响尚未得到充分认识。最后,许多领先的从业者表示,ESG考虑的重要性意味着,作为许多金融理论核心的股东价值最大化的企业目标已经过时,需要被更全面的利益相关者模型所取代。结论是,传统模型的好处和更广泛的利益相关者模型的危险都没有得到充分的认识。•投资者需要认识到,ESG得分高的公司的资金成本越低,投资者的预期回报就越低。•随着市场逐渐认识到高评级ESG公司,实现的回报并不代表长期预期回报。•ESG政策,如碳税,需要由民选官员制定,而不是由既没有适当培训也没有适当激励的企业高管制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信