The internet of things and its impact on social relationships involving mutual trust

G. Kobayashi, M. C. Broens, Maria Eunice Quilici González, Jose Artur Quilici González
{"title":"The internet of things and its impact on social relationships involving mutual trust","authors":"G. Kobayashi, M. C. Broens, Maria Eunice Quilici González, Jose Artur Quilici González","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.2015.7439416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we investigate possible positive and negative consequences of the Internet of Things (IoT), characterized as the scenario in which computing-like technological devices and people can interact and exchange data without the need for deliberate human-to-human interaction, in social practices involving trust. Without denying the positive consequences of IoT, our interest is to discuss the following question: Might the rapid development of artificial autonomous systems, in the context of IoT, undermine the common sense notion of mutual trust? This question will be investigated using the concept of technological affordance, which extends the concept of affordance, according to which organisms directly perceive action opportunities (or affordances) in the environments in which they live because of their co-evolutionary long-term history. We consider that agent/environment interaction processes are predominantly self-organized, with organisms adjusting their actions in the world mainly through learning processes, without any omnipotent central controller. In the case of humans, collective social relationships involving mutual trust seem to result from direct self-organized interactions among members of social groups. Such direct collective interactions generate long-term social habits involving mutual trust that play a central role in human social identity. Nowadays, however, a great part of social interaction is mediated by technologies such as IoT. In this context, possible consequences of such indirect interactions are investigated, focusing on the hypothesis that significant changes in the sense of trust that supports human actions might be expected.","PeriodicalId":357217,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.2015.7439416","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate possible positive and negative consequences of the Internet of Things (IoT), characterized as the scenario in which computing-like technological devices and people can interact and exchange data without the need for deliberate human-to-human interaction, in social practices involving trust. Without denying the positive consequences of IoT, our interest is to discuss the following question: Might the rapid development of artificial autonomous systems, in the context of IoT, undermine the common sense notion of mutual trust? This question will be investigated using the concept of technological affordance, which extends the concept of affordance, according to which organisms directly perceive action opportunities (or affordances) in the environments in which they live because of their co-evolutionary long-term history. We consider that agent/environment interaction processes are predominantly self-organized, with organisms adjusting their actions in the world mainly through learning processes, without any omnipotent central controller. In the case of humans, collective social relationships involving mutual trust seem to result from direct self-organized interactions among members of social groups. Such direct collective interactions generate long-term social habits involving mutual trust that play a central role in human social identity. Nowadays, however, a great part of social interaction is mediated by technologies such as IoT. In this context, possible consequences of such indirect interactions are investigated, focusing on the hypothesis that significant changes in the sense of trust that supports human actions might be expected.
物联网及其对涉及相互信任的社会关系的影响
在本文中,我们研究了物联网(IoT)可能产生的积极和消极后果,其特征是在涉及信任的社会实践中,类似计算的技术设备和人可以在不需要刻意的人与人之间的互动的情况下进行交互和交换数据。在不否认物联网的积极影响的情况下,我们的兴趣是讨论以下问题:在物联网背景下,人工自主系统的快速发展是否会破坏相互信任的常识性概念?这个问题将使用技术能力的概念来研究,它扩展了能力的概念,根据这种概念,生物体直接感知它们所生活的环境中的行动机会(或能力),因为它们共同进化的长期历史。我们认为智能体/环境交互过程主要是自组织的,生物体主要通过学习过程来调整它们在世界上的行为,没有任何无所不能的中央控制器。就人类而言,涉及相互信任的集体社会关系似乎源于社会群体成员之间直接的自组织互动。这种直接的集体互动产生了长期的社会习惯,其中包括相互信任,这在人类社会认同中起着核心作用。然而,如今,很大一部分社会互动是由物联网等技术介导的。在这种背景下,研究了这种间接相互作用的可能后果,重点放在支持人类行为的信任感可能发生重大变化的假设上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信