Rhetorical Argumentation Education in Elementary School

O. Peresada, N. Korepina, E. Zhdanova
{"title":"Rhetorical Argumentation Education in Elementary School","authors":"O. Peresada, N. Korepina, E. Zhdanova","doi":"10.2991/TPHD-18.2019.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper defines the importance of the argumentative culture of a person in the modern world. It reviews the formation of rhetorical competences in elementary school students through educational disputes. The rhetorical skills are defined as the ability to influence an individual or audience with verbal methods during interpersonal or collective communication and are seen as a structural component of communicative competence. Communicative competences are considered the most important, as they include universal learning actions tied to ability to facilitate the dialogue, present personal opinions and rationalize them, while being prepared to resolve conflicts by cooperation and accounting for the interests of both sides. Communicative speech activity the dispute has learning and developmental opportunities in the classroom. The main method chosen for the creation of rhetorical competences in elementary school students is the educational dispute. The conditions pertaining to the most effective formation of rhetorical competence through the educational disputes are defined and validated: learning how to make a reasoning, training how to pick different theses or arguments, creating educational situations with a difficult question, using formulas defined by the","PeriodicalId":151404,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference \"Topical Problems of Philology and Didactics: Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences\" (TPHD 2018)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference \"Topical Problems of Philology and Didactics: Interdisciplinary Approach in Humanities and Social Sciences\" (TPHD 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/TPHD-18.2019.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper defines the importance of the argumentative culture of a person in the modern world. It reviews the formation of rhetorical competences in elementary school students through educational disputes. The rhetorical skills are defined as the ability to influence an individual or audience with verbal methods during interpersonal or collective communication and are seen as a structural component of communicative competence. Communicative competences are considered the most important, as they include universal learning actions tied to ability to facilitate the dialogue, present personal opinions and rationalize them, while being prepared to resolve conflicts by cooperation and accounting for the interests of both sides. Communicative speech activity the dispute has learning and developmental opportunities in the classroom. The main method chosen for the creation of rhetorical competences in elementary school students is the educational dispute. The conditions pertaining to the most effective formation of rhetorical competence through the educational disputes are defined and validated: learning how to make a reasoning, training how to pick different theses or arguments, creating educational situations with a difficult question, using formulas defined by the
小学修辞论证教育
本文定义了一个人的辩论文化在现代世界的重要性。通过教育纠纷,回顾了小学生修辞能力的形成。修辞技巧被定义为在人际或集体交流中,用语言方法影响个人或听众的能力,被视为交际能力的一个结构组成部分。交际能力被认为是最重要的,因为它们包括与促进对话的能力相关的通用学习行动,提出个人意见并使其合理化,同时准备通过合作和考虑双方的利益来解决冲突。交际性言语活动的争议在课堂上具有学习和发展的机会。小学生修辞能力培养的主要方法是教育争议。定义并验证了通过教育辩论最有效地形成修辞能力的条件:学习如何进行推理,训练如何选择不同的论点或论点,用困难的问题创造教育情境,使用由英语定义的公式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信