Effectiveness of tax incentives to boost (retirement) saving: theoretical motivation and empirical evidence

O. Attanasio, J. Banks, M. Wakefield
{"title":"Effectiveness of tax incentives to boost (retirement) saving: theoretical motivation and empirical evidence","authors":"O. Attanasio, J. Banks, M. Wakefield","doi":"10.1920/WP.IFS.2004.0433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adequacy of household saving for retirement has become a policy issue all around the world. The UK and US have been in the vanguard of those countries that have tried to encourage retirement saving by providing tax-favoured treatment for particular savings accounts. We consider empirical evidence from these two countries regarding the extent to which funds in some specific tax advantaged accounts (IRAs in the US, TESSAs and ISAs in the UK) represent new savings. Our best interpretation of this evidence is that: only relatively small fractions of these funds can be considered to be \"new\" saving and so these policies have been an expensive means of encouraging saving; there has been some deadweight loss from the policies associated with \"reshuffling\" of existing savings. Continuing improvements in data on individual financial behaviour create scope for future empirical analysis of incentives to save, both within the standard economic framework that we explain and exploit, and by considering extensions to and adaptations of it.","PeriodicalId":257911,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Economic Studies","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1920/WP.IFS.2004.0433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

The adequacy of household saving for retirement has become a policy issue all around the world. The UK and US have been in the vanguard of those countries that have tried to encourage retirement saving by providing tax-favoured treatment for particular savings accounts. We consider empirical evidence from these two countries regarding the extent to which funds in some specific tax advantaged accounts (IRAs in the US, TESSAs and ISAs in the UK) represent new savings. Our best interpretation of this evidence is that: only relatively small fractions of these funds can be considered to be "new" saving and so these policies have been an expensive means of encouraging saving; there has been some deadweight loss from the policies associated with "reshuffling" of existing savings. Continuing improvements in data on individual financial behaviour create scope for future empirical analysis of incentives to save, both within the standard economic framework that we explain and exploit, and by considering extensions to and adaptations of it.
税收激励提高(退休)储蓄的有效性:理论动机与实证证据
家庭退休储蓄是否充足已成为世界各地的一个政策问题。在那些试图通过为特定储蓄账户提供税收优惠待遇来鼓励退休储蓄的国家中,英国和美国一直走在前列。我们考虑了这两个国家关于某些特定税收优惠账户(美国的ira,英国的tessa和isa)中的资金在多大程度上代表了新的储蓄的经验证据。我们对这一证据的最佳解释是:这些资金中只有相对较小的一部分可以被视为“新”储蓄,因此这些政策一直是鼓励储蓄的昂贵手段;与“重组”现有储蓄相关的政策造成了一些无谓损失。个人金融行为数据的持续改进,为未来对储蓄动机的实证分析创造了空间,既可以在我们解释和利用的标准经济框架内,也可以考虑对其进行扩展和调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信