P. Brackin, R. House, Jenny Mueller-Price, M. DeVasher, R. Layton, Corey Taylor, R. DeVasher, M. Minster, Kathleen S. Toohey
{"title":"Institutionalized: Organizational obstacles to communicating sustainability","authors":"P. Brackin, R. House, Jenny Mueller-Price, M. DeVasher, R. Layton, Corey Taylor, R. DeVasher, M. Minster, Kathleen S. Toohey","doi":"10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper narrates two types of institutional obstacles to advocacy of sustainability. The authors' experiences as advocates for sustainability curriculum and programming at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology demonstrates two impediments to communication that can be generalized to other institutional contexts. Differences in values and language practices among advocates and audiences can preempt both the implementation of sustainability proposals and full sharing of the objectives that define them. The contested meanings of “sustainability” in academic and managerial discourse communities contribute in particularly important ways to these failures.","PeriodicalId":404833,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2011.6087214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This paper narrates two types of institutional obstacles to advocacy of sustainability. The authors' experiences as advocates for sustainability curriculum and programming at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology demonstrates two impediments to communication that can be generalized to other institutional contexts. Differences in values and language practices among advocates and audiences can preempt both the implementation of sustainability proposals and full sharing of the objectives that define them. The contested meanings of “sustainability” in academic and managerial discourse communities contribute in particularly important ways to these failures.
本文叙述了可持续性倡导的两类制度障碍。作者在罗斯-霍尔曼理工学院(Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology)倡导可持续发展课程和规划的经历表明,沟通的两个障碍可以推广到其他机构背景。倡导者和受众之间价值观和语言实践的差异可能会妨碍可持续发展建议的实施和充分分享确定这些建议的目标。在学术和管理话语社区中,“可持续性”的争议意义在特别重要的方面促成了这些失败。