Influence of Different Surface Conditioning Methods on Adhesion of Resin Cement to Zirconia

Tuba Yılmaz Savaş, A. Savaş
{"title":"Influence of Different Surface Conditioning Methods on Adhesion of Resin Cement to Zirconia","authors":"Tuba Yılmaz Savaş, A. Savaş","doi":"10.54995/asc.3.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of the problem: The challenge of enhancing the bond between zirconia and resin remains, and the efforts continue to determine a simple method for achieving a durable bond.\n\nObjective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different surface conditioning strategies on the bond strength between zirconia and resin ce-ment.\n\nMaterials & Methods: Forty zirconia specimens (Lava Plus) were fabricated and divided into four groups: control (no surface treatment), pri-mer application (Z-Prime Plus), experimental acid (H2O:HF:H2O2) applica-tion, and the combination of the acid and primer application (n=10). A dual-cure resin cement (RelyX Ultimate) was applied over the zirconia specimens. Shear bond strength tests were conducted using a universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test within the 95% confidence interval.\n\nResults: The results of the one-way ANOVA showed that acid appli-cation alone (22.99 ± 2.49 MPa) and acid and primer application (25.24 ± 3.19 MPa) had significantly higher bond strength than the primer (18.87 ± 3.13 MPa) and control (14.91 ± 3.72 MPa) groups (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the acid group and acid and primer combination group (P=0.396). The control group had the lowest bond strength in all test groups (P<0.05).\n\nConclusions: Experimental acid treatment alone or in combination with primer application could be effective in improving the bond strength.\n","PeriodicalId":355146,"journal":{"name":"Kapadokya Üniversitesi","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kapadokya Üniversitesi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54995/asc.3.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the problem: The challenge of enhancing the bond between zirconia and resin remains, and the efforts continue to determine a simple method for achieving a durable bond. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different surface conditioning strategies on the bond strength between zirconia and resin ce-ment. Materials & Methods: Forty zirconia specimens (Lava Plus) were fabricated and divided into four groups: control (no surface treatment), pri-mer application (Z-Prime Plus), experimental acid (H2O:HF:H2O2) applica-tion, and the combination of the acid and primer application (n=10). A dual-cure resin cement (RelyX Ultimate) was applied over the zirconia specimens. Shear bond strength tests were conducted using a universal testing machine with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min. The results were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test within the 95% confidence interval. Results: The results of the one-way ANOVA showed that acid appli-cation alone (22.99 ± 2.49 MPa) and acid and primer application (25.24 ± 3.19 MPa) had significantly higher bond strength than the primer (18.87 ± 3.13 MPa) and control (14.91 ± 3.72 MPa) groups (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the acid group and acid and primer combination group (P=0.396). The control group had the lowest bond strength in all test groups (P<0.05). Conclusions: Experimental acid treatment alone or in combination with primer application could be effective in improving the bond strength.
不同表面处理方法对树脂水泥与氧化锆粘结性能的影响
问题说明:增强氧化锆和树脂之间的结合的挑战仍然存在,并且继续努力确定一种简单的方法来实现持久的结合。目的:研究不同表面处理策略对氧化锆与树脂粘结强度的影响。材料与方法:制作40个氧化锆样品(Lava Plus),分为4组:对照组(未进行表面处理)、引物组(Z-Prime Plus)、实验酸组(H2O:HF:H2O2)和酸与引物组合组(n=10)。双固化树脂水泥(RelyX Ultimate)应用于氧化锆标本。剪切粘接强度试验采用万能试验机,横头速度为1mm /min。结果采用单因素方差分析,然后在95%置信区间内进行Tukey事后检验。结果:单因素方差分析结果显示,单独酸处理(22.99±2.49 MPa)和酸+引物处理(25.24±3.19 MPa)的结合强度显著高于引物处理(18.87±3.13 MPa)和对照(14.91±3.72 MPa)组(P<0.05)。酸组与酸与引物组合组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.396)。对照组的黏结强度在各试验组中最低(P<0.05)。结论:实验性酸处理或与底漆联合使用均能有效提高粘结强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信