AMERİKA’DAKİ NEO-MUHAFAZAKAR, LİBERAL TARİHÇİLİK ÇATIŞMASI VE LYNNE CHENEY

Hasan Sungur
{"title":"AMERİKA’DAKİ NEO-MUHAFAZAKAR, LİBERAL TARİHÇİLİK ÇATIŞMASI VE LYNNE CHENEY","authors":"Hasan Sungur","doi":"10.14225/JOH414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When education systems and history education are scrutinized, it is quite easy to notice the intervention of power in chronologically presented historical facts and massages that are conveyed through this information, which can be exemplified with many solid examples. As expected, alternative arguments are often constructed by sides that can be considered as opposition against this involvement of power. These contrasting opinions have myriad of points of origin according to which ideology they are based on, such as but not limited to liberalism, conservatism and socialism. This research examines historical meanings that were attributed by growing neo-conservatism in the United States after 1980, along with history education and history perception of Lynne Cheney who defended neo-conservatism. Thus, by profoundly portraying the education system of the United States, a country that stands among others as a modern state, we would be able compare the American system with its counterparts. While we write about how history education in a particular country can be subjected to various discussions and political conflicts, we will shed light to the fact that education, especially history education, does not only have educational purposes.","PeriodicalId":342763,"journal":{"name":"Journal Of History School","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Of History School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14225/JOH414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When education systems and history education are scrutinized, it is quite easy to notice the intervention of power in chronologically presented historical facts and massages that are conveyed through this information, which can be exemplified with many solid examples. As expected, alternative arguments are often constructed by sides that can be considered as opposition against this involvement of power. These contrasting opinions have myriad of points of origin according to which ideology they are based on, such as but not limited to liberalism, conservatism and socialism. This research examines historical meanings that were attributed by growing neo-conservatism in the United States after 1980, along with history education and history perception of Lynne Cheney who defended neo-conservatism. Thus, by profoundly portraying the education system of the United States, a country that stands among others as a modern state, we would be able compare the American system with its counterparts. While we write about how history education in a particular country can be subjected to various discussions and political conflicts, we will shed light to the fact that education, especially history education, does not only have educational purposes.
当我们仔细审视教育系统和历史教育时,很容易注意到权力对按时间顺序呈现的历史事实的干预,以及通过这些信息传达的信息,这可以用许多坚实的例子来例证。不出所料,不同的论点往往是由可以被视为反对这种权力介入的各方提出的。这些截然不同的观点有无数的起源点,根据他们的意识形态,如但不限于自由主义,保守主义和社会主义。本研究考察了1980年后美国新保守主义的发展所赋予的历史意义,以及为新保守主义辩护的琳恩·切尼的历史教育和历史认知。因此,通过深刻地描绘美国这个现代国家的教育体系,我们将能够将美国的教育体系与其他国家的教育体系进行比较。当我们写一个特定国家的历史教育如何受到各种讨论和政治冲突的影响时,我们将揭示这样一个事实,即教育,特别是历史教育,不仅仅具有教育目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信