Digital Movement of Opinion #BLACKLIVESMATTER in Creating Public Opinion About Black Lives Matter

Rizky Wulan Ramadhani, Edy Prihantoro
{"title":"Digital Movement of Opinion #BLACKLIVESMATTER in Creating Public Opinion About Black Lives Matter","authors":"Rizky Wulan Ramadhani, Edy Prihantoro","doi":"10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"#BlackLivesMatter is still used by netizens to express opinions about the Black Lives Matter movement which is still developing today. In April 2021, the court ruled for Derek Chauvin, the police officer who shot George Floyd. In addition, there are still many shootings of black citizens in the United States and various other countries. This study aims to determine the spread of #BlackLivesMastter and public opinion on Twitter during 20 – 27 April 2021 regarding Black Lives Matter. This research uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative method is used to see the distribution of 2,500 sample tweets using Netlytic.org and Gephi. The qualitative method is conducted to analyze public opinion about Black Lives Matter. The theory used is Computer-Mediated Communication, Public Space, and Critical Discourse Analysis. The results showed that opinions were dominated by positive opinions with 71.76%, negative opinions with 13.08% and irrelevant opinions with 15.16%. The positive opinions are dominant because they have succeeded in creating empathy, anger, and criticism, have political interests, and are voiced by political elite accounts, media, NGOs, and celebrities. Negative opinions are voiced by two main political elites and Twitter users who are not well known so they are considered personal opinions. Irrelevant opinions are voiced by Twitter users in more private spaces and are used to attract public attention.","PeriodicalId":228204,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Komunikasi Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25008/jkiski.v8i1.726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

#BlackLivesMatter is still used by netizens to express opinions about the Black Lives Matter movement which is still developing today. In April 2021, the court ruled for Derek Chauvin, the police officer who shot George Floyd. In addition, there are still many shootings of black citizens in the United States and various other countries. This study aims to determine the spread of #BlackLivesMastter and public opinion on Twitter during 20 – 27 April 2021 regarding Black Lives Matter. This research uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative method is used to see the distribution of 2,500 sample tweets using Netlytic.org and Gephi. The qualitative method is conducted to analyze public opinion about Black Lives Matter. The theory used is Computer-Mediated Communication, Public Space, and Critical Discourse Analysis. The results showed that opinions were dominated by positive opinions with 71.76%, negative opinions with 13.08% and irrelevant opinions with 15.16%. The positive opinions are dominant because they have succeeded in creating empathy, anger, and criticism, have political interests, and are voiced by political elite accounts, media, NGOs, and celebrities. Negative opinions are voiced by two main political elites and Twitter users who are not well known so they are considered personal opinions. Irrelevant opinions are voiced by Twitter users in more private spaces and are used to attract public attention.
数字意见运动#黑人的生命也很重要#在创造关于黑人的生命也很重要的公众舆论方面
#黑人的命也是命#仍被网民用来表达对黑人的命也是命运动的看法,该运动至今仍在发展。2021年4月,法院做出了德里克·肖文(Derek Chauvin)的判决,他是枪杀乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)的警察。此外,在美国和其他一些国家,仍有许多黑人公民被枪杀。本研究旨在确定# blacklivesmaster在2021年4月20日至27日期间在Twitter上关于“黑人的命也重要”的传播情况和公众舆论。本研究采用定量与定性相结合的方法。定量方法用于使用Netlytic.org和Gephi查看2,500个样本tweet的分布。采用定性方法分析公众对“黑人的命也是命”的看法。使用的理论是计算机媒介传播、公共空间和批评话语分析。结果显示,正面意见占71.76%,负面意见占13.08%,无关意见占15.16%。积极的观点占主导地位,因为它们成功地引发了同情、愤怒和批评,具有政治利益,并由政治精英账户、媒体、非政府组织和名人发表。负面意见是由两大政治精英和Twitter用户发表的,他们并不出名,因此被认为是个人意见。不相关的观点由Twitter用户在更私密的空间中表达出来,并被用来吸引公众的注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信