{"title":"Old Growth: A Reconstruction of Gifford Pinchot's Training of a Forester, 1914–37","authors":"C. Miller","doi":"10.2307/3983582","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1897 while serving as a special forestry agent for the Department of the Interior, a young Gifford Pinchot (he was thirty-one years old at the time) travelled to the Pacific Northwest. His task was to inspect the newlycreated federal forest reserves that PresidentCleveland established beforedeparting from officethat March, to offer recommendations about their current boundaries, and to report on their future management. To this list he added a fourth goal: to persuade the region's citizenrythat the forest reserves, against which many had protested for fear that their natural resources would be forever locked up, were a politicaland economic benefit. His was going to be a hard sell.' But sellhe did, arguingthat his philosophy of conservationemphasized \"wise use\" of resources,not their completepreservation. To plead his case, Pinchot carried his message first to that emerginglocus of power in late-nineteenth-century America: the newspapers.At everystop on his three-month tour of the northwest, Pinchot made certain to meet with leadingnewspaper owners and editors to persuade them of the need for federal regulation of natural resources, hoping thereby to shift their editorial opposition. In Spokane and Seattle, for instance, he securedlengthy interviews with publishers,defusing their sharp denunciations of the reserves. He was \"greatly pleased\" byhis action, he wrote his mother after meeting with the editorial board of the Spokane Spokesman-Review, \"because this is one of the most influential of the western papers, and it has hitherto not beenin favor of the reserves. \" Revising the newspapers' perspective, in short, was the most effective means to reshape publicopinion.' Early in his career Pinchot recognized that politics was persuasion, and that airing his ideas before the public was critical to introducing forestry principles to a skepticalnation. His insight into the manner in which \"public opinion is made or directed\" would prove invaluable \"in the work of the Forest Service later on,\" as he acknowledged in his autobiography, Breaking New Ground. Indeed, at the conclusion of his serviceas chiefof the United StatesForest Service in 1910 he had amassed a file of more than 750,000 names of individuals and organizations to whom he regularly sent mass mailings to press his case on conservation, federal regulations, or pending legislation. He had become, as one historian has argued, the \"Press Agent for Forestry.\"! Getting the word out was not simply a facet of successful public relations. Pinchot understood that this was also a means of writing history; his versionof events, if repeated enough and cast as broadly as possible,would becomethe version. Having set the agenda for the present, he could influencethe agenda for the future, consequentlystructuring how succeeding generationswould come to know the past. As he asserted in his autobiography: \"[to] many parts of the story of Forestryin Americafrom 1885 to 1910, I am the only living witness,\" and that is why \"you must take my word or leaveit.\" To a large degreehis assertion has held, and he has remained central to any discussion of the introduction, development, and continued relevance of forestry and conservation in the United States. Gifford Pinchot changed the course of history.'","PeriodicalId":425736,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Conservation History","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Conservation History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983582","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In 1897 while serving as a special forestry agent for the Department of the Interior, a young Gifford Pinchot (he was thirty-one years old at the time) travelled to the Pacific Northwest. His task was to inspect the newlycreated federal forest reserves that PresidentCleveland established beforedeparting from officethat March, to offer recommendations about their current boundaries, and to report on their future management. To this list he added a fourth goal: to persuade the region's citizenrythat the forest reserves, against which many had protested for fear that their natural resources would be forever locked up, were a politicaland economic benefit. His was going to be a hard sell.' But sellhe did, arguingthat his philosophy of conservationemphasized "wise use" of resources,not their completepreservation. To plead his case, Pinchot carried his message first to that emerginglocus of power in late-nineteenth-century America: the newspapers.At everystop on his three-month tour of the northwest, Pinchot made certain to meet with leadingnewspaper owners and editors to persuade them of the need for federal regulation of natural resources, hoping thereby to shift their editorial opposition. In Spokane and Seattle, for instance, he securedlengthy interviews with publishers,defusing their sharp denunciations of the reserves. He was "greatly pleased" byhis action, he wrote his mother after meeting with the editorial board of the Spokane Spokesman-Review, "because this is one of the most influential of the western papers, and it has hitherto not beenin favor of the reserves. " Revising the newspapers' perspective, in short, was the most effective means to reshape publicopinion.' Early in his career Pinchot recognized that politics was persuasion, and that airing his ideas before the public was critical to introducing forestry principles to a skepticalnation. His insight into the manner in which "public opinion is made or directed" would prove invaluable "in the work of the Forest Service later on," as he acknowledged in his autobiography, Breaking New Ground. Indeed, at the conclusion of his serviceas chiefof the United StatesForest Service in 1910 he had amassed a file of more than 750,000 names of individuals and organizations to whom he regularly sent mass mailings to press his case on conservation, federal regulations, or pending legislation. He had become, as one historian has argued, the "Press Agent for Forestry."! Getting the word out was not simply a facet of successful public relations. Pinchot understood that this was also a means of writing history; his versionof events, if repeated enough and cast as broadly as possible,would becomethe version. Having set the agenda for the present, he could influencethe agenda for the future, consequentlystructuring how succeeding generationswould come to know the past. As he asserted in his autobiography: "[to] many parts of the story of Forestryin Americafrom 1885 to 1910, I am the only living witness," and that is why "you must take my word or leaveit." To a large degreehis assertion has held, and he has remained central to any discussion of the introduction, development, and continued relevance of forestry and conservation in the United States. Gifford Pinchot changed the course of history.'
1897年,年轻的吉福德·平肖(当时31岁)作为内政部的特别林业代理人,前往太平洋西北部旅行。他的任务是视察克利夫兰总统在离任前设立的新设立的联邦森林保护区,就保护区目前的边界提出建议,并就未来的管理提出报告。在这个清单上,他又增加了第四个目标:说服该地区的公民,森林保护区是一种政治和经济利益,许多人因为担心他们的自然资源将永远被封锁而抗议。他的计划将是一项艰难的推销。但他坚持认为,他的保护哲学强调的是“明智地利用”资源,而不是完全保护资源。为了为自己的观点辩护,平肖首先把他的观点传达给了19世纪末美国新兴的权力中心:报纸。在他为期三个月的西北之行中,每到一站,平肖都一定要会见主要的报纸老板和编辑,说服他们对自然资源进行联邦监管的必要性,希望借此改变他们在编辑方面的反对意见。例如,在斯波坎和西雅图,他与出版商进行了长时间的采访,化解了他们对保护区的尖锐谴责。在与《斯波坎发言人评论》的编辑委员会会面后,他给母亲写信说,他对自己的行动感到“非常高兴”,“因为这是西方最有影响力的报纸之一,而且迄今为止,它一直不支持保守派。”简而言之,改变报纸的观点是重塑公众舆论的最有效手段。在他职业生涯的早期,平肖认识到政治就是说服,在公众面前公开他的想法对于向一个持怀疑态度的国家介绍林业原则至关重要。正如他在自传《开辟新天地》(Breaking New Ground)中所承认的那样,他对“公众舆论形成或引导”方式的洞见,在“林业局后来的工作”中被证明是无价的。事实上,在1910年卸任美国林务局局长时,他已经积累了超过75万个人和组织的名字,他定期向这些人发送大量邮件,以推动他在保护、联邦法规或未决立法方面的主张。正如一位历史学家所说,他已经成为了“林业的新闻代理人”。传播信息不仅仅是成功公关的一个方面。平肖明白,这也是书写历史的一种手段;他对事件的描述,如果重复得足够多,并尽可能地扩大范围,就会成为那个版本。在为现在设定了议程之后,他可以影响未来的议程,从而构建后代如何了解过去。正如他在自传中所断言的那样:“对于1885年至1910年美国林业故事的许多部分,我是唯一活着的见证人,”这就是为什么“你必须相信我的话,否则就离开它。”在很大程度上,他的主张是正确的,他仍然是任何关于美国林业和保护的引进、发展和继续相关的讨论的中心。吉福德·平肖改变了历史的进程。”