Pressure Surge Load Estimation on Pipes With Dimensional Reduction and Rayleigh Energy Method

A. Seena, Juyoul Kim
{"title":"Pressure Surge Load Estimation on Pipes With Dimensional Reduction and Rayleigh Energy Method","authors":"A. Seena, Juyoul Kim","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The pressure surge in pipes due to change in operating conditions exerts an axial load on elbows proportional to the change in momentum of fluid and unbalanced pressure forces. The response of piping structure to such load needs the full time history analysis in three dimensional spaces which is cumbersome process due to high computing memory requirements and long simulation time. In present work it has been shown that using Rayleigh energy balance for each elbow-load configuration, the system can be reduced to equivalent 1D spring mass system and the response can be estimated by solving 1D equation of motion. Then it has been recommended to simulate the response of each elbow which gives good approximation of dynamic amplification of displacement also called as Dynamic Load Factor (DLF). These dynamic load factors for each elbow can be used for the interaction of forces using static equivalent response in 3D space. This approach is pseudo static equivalent analysis where the load amplifications factors DLF are estimated from the dynamic force profile and system response in one-dimensional space. An algorithm is developed for the above explained process. Most of the engineers are using the DLF = 2 for the load estimation due to absence of method to estimate the dynamic load factor. The approach was proposed by Goodling in 1989 and still widely followed in the industry. The present paper discusses uncertainty and inaccuracy involved in performing approximate analysis and shows the significance and need of performing full force time history analysis. The proposed method shows very good agreement with the time consuming 3D full force time history results. There are also limitations for the proposed method. As the spring mass system is simulated with dimensional reduction to single frequency domain, the pipe supports and guides should be properly placed before applying the present approach. It has been shown that with proper support configuration, this simplified approach yields very good approximation of surge load on pipes with reduced time.","PeriodicalId":150804,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3: Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pressure surge in pipes due to change in operating conditions exerts an axial load on elbows proportional to the change in momentum of fluid and unbalanced pressure forces. The response of piping structure to such load needs the full time history analysis in three dimensional spaces which is cumbersome process due to high computing memory requirements and long simulation time. In present work it has been shown that using Rayleigh energy balance for each elbow-load configuration, the system can be reduced to equivalent 1D spring mass system and the response can be estimated by solving 1D equation of motion. Then it has been recommended to simulate the response of each elbow which gives good approximation of dynamic amplification of displacement also called as Dynamic Load Factor (DLF). These dynamic load factors for each elbow can be used for the interaction of forces using static equivalent response in 3D space. This approach is pseudo static equivalent analysis where the load amplifications factors DLF are estimated from the dynamic force profile and system response in one-dimensional space. An algorithm is developed for the above explained process. Most of the engineers are using the DLF = 2 for the load estimation due to absence of method to estimate the dynamic load factor. The approach was proposed by Goodling in 1989 and still widely followed in the industry. The present paper discusses uncertainty and inaccuracy involved in performing approximate analysis and shows the significance and need of performing full force time history analysis. The proposed method shows very good agreement with the time consuming 3D full force time history results. There are also limitations for the proposed method. As the spring mass system is simulated with dimensional reduction to single frequency domain, the pipe supports and guides should be properly placed before applying the present approach. It has been shown that with proper support configuration, this simplified approach yields very good approximation of surge load on pipes with reduced time.
基于降维和瑞利能量法的管道压力波动负荷估计
由于工作条件的变化,管道中的压力波动对弯头施加了与流体动量变化成正比的轴向载荷和不平衡压力。管道结构在这种荷载作用下的响应需要在三维空间中进行全时程分析,由于计算内存要求高,仿真时间长,过程繁琐。本文的研究表明,利用瑞利能量平衡对每个肘载构型,系统可以简化为等效的一维弹簧质量系统,并且可以通过求解一维运动方程来估计响应。然后,建议对每个弯头的响应进行模拟,这可以很好地近似位移的动态放大,也称为动态载荷系数(DLF)。每个弯头的这些动态载荷因子可以用于三维空间中使用静态等效响应的力的相互作用。该方法是一种伪静态等效分析方法,通过一维空间的动力剖面和系统响应估计载荷放大系数DLF。针对上述过程,开发了一种算法。由于缺乏动态负荷因子的估计方法,大多数工程师都使用DLF = 2进行负荷估计。该方法由Goodling于1989年提出,至今仍被业界广泛采用。本文讨论了进行近似分析所涉及的不确定性和不准确性,并说明了进行全力时程分析的意义和必要性。该方法与耗时的三维全力时程计算结果吻合较好。所提出的方法也有局限性。由于弹簧质量系统的模拟是降维到单频域的,因此在采用本方法之前,应适当地放置管道支撑和导轨。结果表明,在适当的支撑结构下,这种简化方法可以在较短的时间内很好地逼近管道上的喘振负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信