{"title":"Regulating the Female Body","authors":"F. Amery","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529204995.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter sets the history of abortion law this in the context of feminist critique, exploring the significance of access to abortion for women’s lives and the gendered structure of society. It contains a discussion of feminist writing on pregnancy and motherhood and what these mean for female subjectivity: from Simone de Beauvoir’s description of pregnancy as a ‘servitude’, to Shulamith Firestone’s call for reproductive technologies that can separate the process of reproduction from women’s bodies. This chapter also explores the reproductive justice movement, which has emphasised the ways in which the needs of poor, minority ethnic and migrant women may differ from those of white middle-class women. The chapter argues that access to abortion can have radical implications for women’s lives, freeing women from compulsory motherhood. Yet celebratory accounts of abortion in Britain must be tempered. Abortion law has always relied heavily on the capacity of the medical profession to control women’s reproductive choices.","PeriodicalId":405787,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Pro-life and Pro-choice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529204995.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This chapter sets the history of abortion law this in the context of feminist critique, exploring the significance of access to abortion for women’s lives and the gendered structure of society. It contains a discussion of feminist writing on pregnancy and motherhood and what these mean for female subjectivity: from Simone de Beauvoir’s description of pregnancy as a ‘servitude’, to Shulamith Firestone’s call for reproductive technologies that can separate the process of reproduction from women’s bodies. This chapter also explores the reproductive justice movement, which has emphasised the ways in which the needs of poor, minority ethnic and migrant women may differ from those of white middle-class women. The chapter argues that access to abortion can have radical implications for women’s lives, freeing women from compulsory motherhood. Yet celebratory accounts of abortion in Britain must be tempered. Abortion law has always relied heavily on the capacity of the medical profession to control women’s reproductive choices.
本章将堕胎法的历史置于女权主义批判的背景下,探讨堕胎对女性生活和社会性别结构的意义。它包含了关于怀孕和母性的女权主义写作的讨论,以及这些对女性主体性的意义:从西蒙娜·德·波伏娃(Simone de Beauvoir)将怀孕描述为一种“奴役”,到舒拉米斯·费尔斯通(Shulamith Firestone)呼吁将生殖过程与女性身体分离的生殖技术。本章还探讨了生殖正义运动,该运动强调了贫穷、少数民族和移民妇女的需求可能与白人中产阶级妇女的需求不同的方式。这一章认为,堕胎可以对妇女的生活产生根本性的影响,将妇女从强制性生育中解放出来。然而,英国对堕胎的庆祝报道必须有所缓和。堕胎法一直在很大程度上依赖于医疗专业人员控制妇女生育选择的能力。