P50/P90 Analysis of a Solar Photovoltaic Plant in METU NCC Using the Empirical Method

Deniz Gören, O. Taylan
{"title":"P50/P90 Analysis of a Solar Photovoltaic Plant in METU NCC Using the Empirical Method","authors":"Deniz Gören, O. Taylan","doi":"10.1109/PVCon51547.2020.9757770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large investments in renewable energy systems have some financial risks, and energy exceedance probabilities are required to find the expected range of energy yield values. In this study, P50/P90 analysis was done for a 1 MWp solar photovoltaic (PV) power plant in METU NCC using the System Advisor Model (SAM) software. Three different transposition models were used, which are the isotropic sky-diffuse, HDKR, and Perez models. Photovoltaic Geographical Information System-Surface Solar Radiation Dataset Heliosat (PVGISSARAH) database was used as the long-term satellite-based data, which includes the time period 2005-2016 with hourly time resolution, and three different typical meteorological year (TMY) datasets were used to compare the results with P50 values. Actual energy yield data of the years 2016 and 2017 were also compared. Interannual variability of global horizontal irradiation (GHI) was found as about 2.21%. According to the comparison of TMY and P50 values, it was found that average TMY underpredicted the annual GHI by 5.15%, and the energy yield values by 6.77%, 6.86%, and 6.83% for the isotropic, HDKR, and Perez models, respectively. Normal distribution assumption was also compared with the empirical method, and P50 value was underpredicted by 0.43% and 0.93% on average for GHI and energy yield, respectively. On the other hand, Normal CDF overpredicted P90 values than the empirical CDF by 2.61% and 3.93% for GHI and the energy yield, respectively. The overall uncertainty of energy yield was found as about 7.08%. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) also varied by 3.50% on average, and the non-exceedance probability values were obtained with respect to the energy yield.","PeriodicalId":277228,"journal":{"name":"2020 2nd International Conference on Photovoltaic Science and Technologies (PVCon)","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 2nd International Conference on Photovoltaic Science and Technologies (PVCon)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVCon51547.2020.9757770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Large investments in renewable energy systems have some financial risks, and energy exceedance probabilities are required to find the expected range of energy yield values. In this study, P50/P90 analysis was done for a 1 MWp solar photovoltaic (PV) power plant in METU NCC using the System Advisor Model (SAM) software. Three different transposition models were used, which are the isotropic sky-diffuse, HDKR, and Perez models. Photovoltaic Geographical Information System-Surface Solar Radiation Dataset Heliosat (PVGISSARAH) database was used as the long-term satellite-based data, which includes the time period 2005-2016 with hourly time resolution, and three different typical meteorological year (TMY) datasets were used to compare the results with P50 values. Actual energy yield data of the years 2016 and 2017 were also compared. Interannual variability of global horizontal irradiation (GHI) was found as about 2.21%. According to the comparison of TMY and P50 values, it was found that average TMY underpredicted the annual GHI by 5.15%, and the energy yield values by 6.77%, 6.86%, and 6.83% for the isotropic, HDKR, and Perez models, respectively. Normal distribution assumption was also compared with the empirical method, and P50 value was underpredicted by 0.43% and 0.93% on average for GHI and energy yield, respectively. On the other hand, Normal CDF overpredicted P90 values than the empirical CDF by 2.61% and 3.93% for GHI and the energy yield, respectively. The overall uncertainty of energy yield was found as about 7.08%. The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) also varied by 3.50% on average, and the non-exceedance probability values were obtained with respect to the energy yield.
METU NCC太阳能光伏电站P50/P90的实证分析
可再生能源系统的大规模投资存在一定的财务风险,并且需要能量超越概率来找到能量收益率值的预期范围。在本研究中,使用系统顾问模型(SAM)软件对METU NCC的1 MWp太阳能光伏(PV)发电厂进行了P50/P90分析。使用了三种不同的转位模型,即各向同性天空漫射模型、HDKR模型和Perez模型。利用光伏地理信息系统-地表太阳辐射数据集Heliosat (PVGISSARAH)数据库作为2005-2016年逐时分辨率的长期卫星数据,利用3个不同典型气象年(TMY)数据集与P50值进行比较。2016年和2017年的实际发电量数据也进行了比较。全球水平辐射(GHI)的年际变率约为2.21%。对比TMY和P50值发现,各向异性、HDKR和Perez模型的平均TMY对年GHI的预测分别低5.15%、6.77%、6.86%和6.83%。正态分布假设与经验方法比较,GHI和能源产量的P50值平均分别被低估0.43%和0.93%。正常CDF对GHI和能量产量的P90预测值分别比经验CDF高2.61%和3.93%。产能的总体不确定度约为7.08%。平准化电力成本(LCOE)也平均变化了3.50%,得到了相对于发电量的不超过概率值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信