{"title":"Ben & Jerry's Homemade","authors":"Michael J. Schill","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1279317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case examines issues of asset control for Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc., in light of the outstanding takeover offers by Chartwell Investments, Dreyer's Grand, Unilever, and Meadowbrook Lane Capital in January 2000. The case provides a unique opportunity to discuss fundamental firm objectives and the implications of a nontraditional corporate orientation; it reviews the development of Ben & Jerry's strong social consciousness and the takeover-defense mechanisms that maintain management's control of company assets. Students, in the role of outside board members, are invited to review management's performance, estimate the economic cost of its social agenda, and evaluate the implications of takeover-defense strategies. Ultimately, they must take a position on whether Ben & Jerry's should continue to pursue its social agenda independently or accept one of the attractive takeover offers and shift toward greater profit orientation. The case requires relatively little knowledge of finance, and is designed largely to provide a stimulating introduction to the principles of a traditional corporate finance curriculum.","PeriodicalId":302905,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Finance (Topic)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Darden Case: Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1279317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This case examines issues of asset control for Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc., in light of the outstanding takeover offers by Chartwell Investments, Dreyer's Grand, Unilever, and Meadowbrook Lane Capital in January 2000. The case provides a unique opportunity to discuss fundamental firm objectives and the implications of a nontraditional corporate orientation; it reviews the development of Ben & Jerry's strong social consciousness and the takeover-defense mechanisms that maintain management's control of company assets. Students, in the role of outside board members, are invited to review management's performance, estimate the economic cost of its social agenda, and evaluate the implications of takeover-defense strategies. Ultimately, they must take a position on whether Ben & Jerry's should continue to pursue its social agenda independently or accept one of the attractive takeover offers and shift toward greater profit orientation. The case requires relatively little knowledge of finance, and is designed largely to provide a stimulating introduction to the principles of a traditional corporate finance curriculum.