Im Schattenreich der Institution: Eine affekttheoretische Perspektive

C. Scheve, Jan Slaby
{"title":"Im Schattenreich der Institution: Eine affekttheoretische Perspektive","authors":"C. Scheve, Jan Slaby","doi":"10.14361/zkkw-2022-080107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although affect and emotion are often discussed in institutional and organizational research, they are rarely studied systematically and in accordance with their overall relevance. To investigate the decisive but subtle, sometimes barely noticeable or taken-for-granted power of institutions, we need to achieve a better understanding of the close intertwining of institutional rules, operations, and spaces with complex affective dynamics. In this article, we therefore develop an analytical framework that allows to investigate the countless affective dynamics that characterize institutions. First, this framework can help to come to terms with the multidimensionality of institutional affect and thus inform empirical studies of institutions. Second, our approach allows scholars and researchers to make visible those developments and modes of agency that run counter to the official functions and self-understandings of institutions. As a an initial step, we propose a conceptual clarification of „institution“ and „organization“ that incorporates various references to social theory which already foreshadow some dynamics of institutional affect. Further detailing this perspective, we develop an analytical grid that focuses, first, on what we call the „guiding affects“ of institutions and, second, on the internal affective dynamics of institutions. The proposed framework provides a variety of links to discussions of institutions in cultural studies and the social sciences.","PeriodicalId":106948,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für Kultur- und Kollektivwissenschaft","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für Kultur- und Kollektivwissenschaft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/zkkw-2022-080107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Although affect and emotion are often discussed in institutional and organizational research, they are rarely studied systematically and in accordance with their overall relevance. To investigate the decisive but subtle, sometimes barely noticeable or taken-for-granted power of institutions, we need to achieve a better understanding of the close intertwining of institutional rules, operations, and spaces with complex affective dynamics. In this article, we therefore develop an analytical framework that allows to investigate the countless affective dynamics that characterize institutions. First, this framework can help to come to terms with the multidimensionality of institutional affect and thus inform empirical studies of institutions. Second, our approach allows scholars and researchers to make visible those developments and modes of agency that run counter to the official functions and self-understandings of institutions. As a an initial step, we propose a conceptual clarification of „institution“ and „organization“ that incorporates various references to social theory which already foreshadow some dynamics of institutional affect. Further detailing this perspective, we develop an analytical grid that focuses, first, on what we call the „guiding affects“ of institutions and, second, on the internal affective dynamics of institutions. The proposed framework provides a variety of links to discussions of institutions in cultural studies and the social sciences.
情感理论观点
虽然在机构和组织研究中经常讨论情感和情绪,但很少系统地研究它们,并根据它们的总体相关性进行研究。为了研究制度的决定性但微妙的、有时几乎不引人注意或被视为理所当然的力量,我们需要更好地理解制度规则、运作和空间与复杂情感动态的密切交织。因此,在本文中,我们开发了一个分析框架,允许调查表征制度的无数情感动态。首先,这一框架有助于理解制度影响的多维性,从而为制度的实证研究提供信息。其次,我们的方法使学者和研究人员能够看到那些与机构的官方功能和自我理解背道而驰的机构的发展和模式。作为第一步,我们提出了对“制度”和“组织”的概念澄清,其中包含了各种社会理论的参考,这些理论已经预示了制度影响的一些动态。进一步详述这一观点,我们开发了一个分析网格,首先关注制度的“指导影响”,其次关注制度的内部情感动态。拟议的框架为文化研究和社会科学机构的讨论提供了各种联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信