Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Intestinal Barrier in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery-A Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial.

Y. Qi, Wenjing Ma, Ying-Ya Cao, Qun Chen, Qiancheng Xu, Shi Xiao, Weihua Lu, zhen wang
{"title":"Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Intestinal Barrier in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Surgery-A Single-Center Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Y. Qi, Wenjing Ma, Ying-Ya Cao, Qun Chen, Qiancheng Xu, Shi Xiao, Weihua Lu, zhen wang","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-150967/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nGastrointestinal failure results in death in critically ill patients. This study aimed to explore the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on intestinal barrier function and its mechanism in critically ill patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nPatients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery were randomized into the DEX group (n = 21) or midazolam (MID) group (n = 21). Sufentanil was used for analgesia in both groups. In the DEX group, DEX was loaded (1 μg/kg) before sedation and infused (0.7 μg/kg/h) during sedation. In the MID group, MID was loaded (0.05 mg/kg) before sedation and infused (0.1 mg/kg/h) during sedation. The mean arterial pressure , heart rate , borborygmus resumption time , first defecation time, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay were observed. The diamine oxidase (DAO), D-lactate , TNF-α, IL-6, and α7nAChR levels in plasma or hemocytes were detected before the start of sedation (0 h) and after sedation (24 h).\n\n\nRESULTS\nNo significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were noted (P > 0.05). The mean arterial pressure between 0 h and 24 h showed no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05), but the heart rate was significantly lower in the DEX group (P = 0.042). The borborygmus resumption time was significantly earlier in the DEX group (P = 0.034). The lengths of intensive care unit stay (P = 0.016) and hospital stay (P = 0.031) were significantly shorter in the DEX group. The TNF-α level in the DEX group was lower at 24 h than 0 h. The D-lactate level was significantly lower in the DEX group than the MID group at 24 h (P = 0.016). The expression of α7nAChR in the DEX group was significantly higher at 24 h than 0 h (P < 0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nDEX maintained intestinal barrier integrity in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery through the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway.","PeriodicalId":191568,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of surgical research","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of surgical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-150967/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Gastrointestinal failure results in death in critically ill patients. This study aimed to explore the effect of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on intestinal barrier function and its mechanism in critically ill patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS Patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery were randomized into the DEX group (n = 21) or midazolam (MID) group (n = 21). Sufentanil was used for analgesia in both groups. In the DEX group, DEX was loaded (1 μg/kg) before sedation and infused (0.7 μg/kg/h) during sedation. In the MID group, MID was loaded (0.05 mg/kg) before sedation and infused (0.1 mg/kg/h) during sedation. The mean arterial pressure , heart rate , borborygmus resumption time , first defecation time, length of intensive care unit stay, and length of hospital stay were observed. The diamine oxidase (DAO), D-lactate , TNF-α, IL-6, and α7nAChR levels in plasma or hemocytes were detected before the start of sedation (0 h) and after sedation (24 h). RESULTS No significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores were noted (P > 0.05). The mean arterial pressure between 0 h and 24 h showed no significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05), but the heart rate was significantly lower in the DEX group (P = 0.042). The borborygmus resumption time was significantly earlier in the DEX group (P = 0.034). The lengths of intensive care unit stay (P = 0.016) and hospital stay (P = 0.031) were significantly shorter in the DEX group. The TNF-α level in the DEX group was lower at 24 h than 0 h. The D-lactate level was significantly lower in the DEX group than the MID group at 24 h (P = 0.016). The expression of α7nAChR in the DEX group was significantly higher at 24 h than 0 h (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS DEX maintained intestinal barrier integrity in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery through the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway.
右美托咪定对胃肠手术患者肠道屏障的影响——一项单中心随机临床试验
胃肠衰竭可导致危重病人死亡。本研究旨在探讨右美托咪定(DEX)对胃肠手术危重患者肠道屏障功能的影响及其机制。方法将胃肠手术患者随机分为右美托咪唑仑组(n = 21)和咪达唑仑组(n = 21)。两组均采用舒芬太尼镇痛。右美托咪唑组在镇静前注射右美托咪唑(1 μg/kg),镇静时注射右美托咪唑(0.7 μg/kg/h)。MID组在镇静前灌注0.05 mg/kg的MID,镇静时灌注0.1 mg/kg/h的MID。观察两组患者平均动脉压、心率、排便恢复时间、首次排便时间、重症监护室住院时间和住院时间。检测两组患者在镇静开始前(0 h)和镇静结束后(24 h)血浆及血细胞中二胺氧化酶(DAO)、d -乳酸、TNF-α、IL-6、α7nAChR水平。结果两组患者年龄、性别、体重指数、急性生理与慢性健康评估II和序期器官衰竭评分差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。0 h ~ 24 h平均动脉压组间差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05),但DEX组心率显著降低(P = 0.042)。DEX组鼻咽癌恢复时间明显早于DEX组(P = 0.034)。DEX组重症监护病房住院时间(P = 0.016)和住院时间(P = 0.031)均显著缩短。DEX组24 h TNF-α水平低于0 h, 24 h d -乳酸水平显著低于MID组(P = 0.016)。DEX组α7nAChR表达量在24 h显著高于0 h (P < 0.05)。结论sdex通过胆碱能抗炎途径维持胃肠手术患者肠道屏障的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信