The Evaluation Of Warehouse Receipt System Object Regulation: A Perspective Study Of Commodity Goods Concept In Indonesia

Khoirul Hidayah, Iffaty Nasyi’ah, Dwi Fidhayanti
{"title":"The Evaluation Of Warehouse Receipt System Object Regulation: A Perspective Study Of Commodity Goods Concept In Indonesia","authors":"Khoirul Hidayah, Iffaty Nasyi’ah, Dwi Fidhayanti","doi":"10.33756/jelta.v15i2.15752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are normative issues related to the concept of commodity goods with the object of warehouse receipts and social issues regarding the benefits of warehouse receipts for grain or rice farmers. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the regulation of the object of the warehouse receipt system so that it has a unique contribution to small farmers. The research applied in this research is juridical-empirical with a qualitative approach. The fact shows that rice farmers do not want to use the Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) because of the high cost and tend to choose the People's Business Credit program. Based on the study of the concept of commodities and benefits, it is necessary to change regulations related to the concept of WRS objects so that it is better to equate it with the concept of commodities. Grain or rice is a staple food that is excluded from the WRS object following the commodity concept because it has access to subsidies and special incentives from the government for national food security. Smallholders do not need to store rice in warehouses as in the WRS procedure to gain access to credit. This study shows that the government is reviewing the regulation of WRS objects in Indonesia so that it is beneficial for small farmers in particular.","PeriodicalId":241586,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL LEGALITAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33756/jelta.v15i2.15752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are normative issues related to the concept of commodity goods with the object of warehouse receipts and social issues regarding the benefits of warehouse receipts for grain or rice farmers. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the regulation of the object of the warehouse receipt system so that it has a unique contribution to small farmers. The research applied in this research is juridical-empirical with a qualitative approach. The fact shows that rice farmers do not want to use the Warehouse Receipt System (WRS) because of the high cost and tend to choose the People's Business Credit program. Based on the study of the concept of commodities and benefits, it is necessary to change regulations related to the concept of WRS objects so that it is better to equate it with the concept of commodities. Grain or rice is a staple food that is excluded from the WRS object following the commodity concept because it has access to subsidies and special incentives from the government for national food security. Smallholders do not need to store rice in warehouses as in the WRS procedure to gain access to credit. This study shows that the government is reviewing the regulation of WRS objects in Indonesia so that it is beneficial for small farmers in particular.
仓单制度客体规制的评价:印尼商品概念的视角研究
以仓单为对象的商品概念存在规范性问题,粮食或水稻农民的仓单利益也存在社会问题。因此,有必要对仓单制度的规制对象进行评价,使其对小农具有独特的贡献。本研究采用的研究方法是司法-实证与定性的方法。事实表明,稻农不愿意使用仓单系统(WRS),因为成本高,倾向于选择人民企业信贷计划。在对商品和利益概念进行研究的基础上,有必要对WRS对象概念的相关规定进行修改,以便更好地将其等同于商品概念。粮食或大米是根据商品概念被排除在WRS对象之外的主食,因为它可以获得政府的国家粮食保障补贴和特别奖励。小农不需要像WRS程序那样将大米储存在仓库中以获得信贷。这项研究表明,印尼政府正在审查对WRS对象的监管,以使其对小农尤其有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信