Cookie Banners, What's the Purpose?: Analyzing Cookie Banner Text Through a Legal Lens

C. Santos, Arianna Rossi, Lorena Sánchez Chamorro, Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy, Ruba Abu-Salma
{"title":"Cookie Banners, What's the Purpose?: Analyzing Cookie Banner Text Through a Legal Lens","authors":"C. Santos, Arianna Rossi, Lorena Sánchez Chamorro, Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy, Ruba Abu-Salma","doi":"10.1145/3463676.3485611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A cookie banner pops up when a user visits a website for the first time, requesting consent to the use of cookies and other trackers for a variety of purposes. Unlike prior work that has focused on evaluating the user interface (UI) design of cookie banners, this paper presents an in-depth analysis of what cookie banners say to users to get their consent. We took an interdisciplinary approach to determiningwhat cookie banners should say. Following the legal requirements of the ePrivacy Directive (ePD) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we manually annotated around 400 cookie banners presented on the most popular English-speaking websites visited by users residing in the EU. We focused on analyzing the purposes of cookie banners and how these purposes were expressed (e.g., any misleading or vague language, any use of jargon). We found that 89% of cookie banners violated applicable laws. In particular, 61% of banners violated the purpose specificity requirement by mentioning vague purposes, including \"\\emphuser experience enhancement ''. Further, 30% of banners used positive framing, breaching the freely given and informed consent requirements. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations that regulators can find useful. We also describe future research directions.","PeriodicalId":205601,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3463676.3485611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

A cookie banner pops up when a user visits a website for the first time, requesting consent to the use of cookies and other trackers for a variety of purposes. Unlike prior work that has focused on evaluating the user interface (UI) design of cookie banners, this paper presents an in-depth analysis of what cookie banners say to users to get their consent. We took an interdisciplinary approach to determiningwhat cookie banners should say. Following the legal requirements of the ePrivacy Directive (ePD) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), we manually annotated around 400 cookie banners presented on the most popular English-speaking websites visited by users residing in the EU. We focused on analyzing the purposes of cookie banners and how these purposes were expressed (e.g., any misleading or vague language, any use of jargon). We found that 89% of cookie banners violated applicable laws. In particular, 61% of banners violated the purpose specificity requirement by mentioning vague purposes, including "\emphuser experience enhancement ''. Further, 30% of banners used positive framing, breaching the freely given and informed consent requirements. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations that regulators can find useful. We also describe future research directions.
Cookie横幅的目的是什么?:从法律角度分析Cookie横幅文本
当用户第一次访问网站时,会弹出一个cookie横幅,请求用户同意出于各种目的使用cookie和其他跟踪器。不像之前的工作集中在评估cookie横幅的用户界面(UI)设计上,本文深入分析了cookie横幅对用户说什么以获得他们的同意。我们采用跨学科的方法来确定cookie横幅应该说什么。根据电子隐私指令(ePD)和一般数据保护条例(GDPR)的法律要求,我们在居住在欧盟的用户访问的最受欢迎的英语网站上手动标注了大约400个cookie横幅。我们专注于分析cookie横幅的目的以及这些目的是如何表达的(例如,任何误导性或模糊的语言,任何术语的使用)。我们发现89%的cookie横幅违反了相关法律。特别是,61%的横幅违反了目的专一性要求,提到了模糊的目的,包括“增强用户体验”。此外,30%的横幅使用了积极的框架,违反了自由给予和知情同意的要求。基于这些发现,我们提出了监管机构可能会发现有用的建议。展望了未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信