Combined link dimensioning and weight assignment of minimum weight routing networks

Carlos B. Lopes, A. Sousa, Luís Gouveia
{"title":"Combined link dimensioning and weight assignment of minimum weight routing networks","authors":"Carlos B. Lopes, A. Sousa, Luís Gouveia","doi":"10.1109/NGI.2005.1431664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MPLS (multi-protocol label switching) technology provides the flexibility required for managing the way the traffic is routed through the network. However, label switched path (LSP) configuring is a hard task in a growing network, as more and more routes need configuring and monitoring. A viable alternative may be to rely on an IGP (interior gateway protocol) routing protocol to determine the paths to be used by the LSPs, thus freeing the operator from the manual configuring of all LSP paths. Here, we address the procedure of dimensioning a MPLS network where a minimum weight routing protocol (as OSPF or IS-IS) is used to determine the paths of the LSPs. We start by presenting the complete minimum weight routing network design problem (MWRNDP) with explicit minimum weight routing constraints. Then, we propose a two-step approach based on two ILP models which are a decomposition of the complete model in two separate optimization problems: first, we determine the physical network configuration and the traffic flow routing with the network design problem (NDP); then, we determine the link weights required to achieve the determined traffic routing with the link weight assignment problem (LWA). Because in the first problem the traffic routing is destination based, there may be instances where a minimum weight routing solution is not found. In these cases, an additional constraint is added to the first problem and the two-step approach is repeated. An important observation is that this methodology obtains the optimal solutions and the computational results show that it requires much lower computational times than the original global MWRNDP model. Using the two-step approach, a set of computational tests is presented to determine the cost penalty in MPLS network design when using minimum weight routing as opposed to source based routing.","PeriodicalId":435785,"journal":{"name":"Next Generation Internet Networks, 2005","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Generation Internet Networks, 2005","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NGI.2005.1431664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

MPLS (multi-protocol label switching) technology provides the flexibility required for managing the way the traffic is routed through the network. However, label switched path (LSP) configuring is a hard task in a growing network, as more and more routes need configuring and monitoring. A viable alternative may be to rely on an IGP (interior gateway protocol) routing protocol to determine the paths to be used by the LSPs, thus freeing the operator from the manual configuring of all LSP paths. Here, we address the procedure of dimensioning a MPLS network where a minimum weight routing protocol (as OSPF or IS-IS) is used to determine the paths of the LSPs. We start by presenting the complete minimum weight routing network design problem (MWRNDP) with explicit minimum weight routing constraints. Then, we propose a two-step approach based on two ILP models which are a decomposition of the complete model in two separate optimization problems: first, we determine the physical network configuration and the traffic flow routing with the network design problem (NDP); then, we determine the link weights required to achieve the determined traffic routing with the link weight assignment problem (LWA). Because in the first problem the traffic routing is destination based, there may be instances where a minimum weight routing solution is not found. In these cases, an additional constraint is added to the first problem and the two-step approach is repeated. An important observation is that this methodology obtains the optimal solutions and the computational results show that it requires much lower computational times than the original global MWRNDP model. Using the two-step approach, a set of computational tests is presented to determine the cost penalty in MPLS network design when using minimum weight routing as opposed to source based routing.
结合最小权值路由网络的链路尺寸和权值分配
MPLS(多协议标签交换)技术为管理流量在网络中的路由方式提供了所需的灵活性。随着网络规模的扩大,需要配置和监控的路由越来越多,LSP (label switched path)的配置成为一项艰巨的任务。一个可行的替代方案可能是依靠IGP(内部网关协议)路由协议来确定LSP使用的路径,从而使运营商从手动配置所有LSP路径中解脱出来。在这里,我们将讨论在使用最小权重路由协议(如OSPF或is - is)来确定lsp路径的MPLS网络的维度划分过程。我们首先提出具有明确的最小权重路由约束的完整最小权重路由网络设计问题(MWRNDP)。然后,我们提出了一种基于两个ILP模型的两步方法,这两个模型是将完整模型分解为两个独立的优化问题:首先,我们用网络设计问题(NDP)确定物理网络配置和流量路由;然后,利用链路权重分配问题(LWA)确定实现确定的流量路由所需的链路权重。因为在第一个问题中,流量路由是基于目的地的,所以可能存在找不到最小权重路由解决方案的情况。在这些情况下,向第一个问题添加额外的约束,并重复两步方法。一个重要的观察结果是,该方法得到了最优解,计算结果表明,它比原始的全局MWRNDP模型所需的计算时间要少得多。采用两步方法,提出了一组计算测试,以确定在使用最小权重路由而不是基于源的路由时MPLS网络设计中的成本损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信