What's in a Name - Facebook's Real Name Policy and User Privacy

Shun-Ling Chen
{"title":"What's in a Name - Facebook's Real Name Policy and User Privacy","authors":"Shun-Ling Chen","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3332188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There have been growing concerns about the danger of a surveillance society that is facilitated by social media, in which individuals voluntarily surrender their data to service providers. Amongst the major social media services, Facebook stands out not only because of its market share but also because of its insistence on a strong real name policy. Subscribers must sign up with their real name as their username on the platform. Due to this policy, Facebook users have more reasons to worry about government and corporate surveillance. Facebook’s subscribers have protested against its real name policy. Yet Facebook’s position on demanding real names remains firm. The track record of Facebook’s privacy practice is problematic, although they repeatedly assert that users have control of their data, including how much Facebook uses the users’ data they collected for targeted advertising. This paper argues that users lose much of their control so long as Facebook continues to insist on its real name policy, because there is already so much information about us in our names. This paper addresses why Facebook should reconsider their position and allow pseudonymous usernames, and discusses the potential legal grounds to challenge Facebook’s real name policy under EU GDPR’s new regulatory regime.","PeriodicalId":361748,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Technology eJournal","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Technology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3332188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

There have been growing concerns about the danger of a surveillance society that is facilitated by social media, in which individuals voluntarily surrender their data to service providers. Amongst the major social media services, Facebook stands out not only because of its market share but also because of its insistence on a strong real name policy. Subscribers must sign up with their real name as their username on the platform. Due to this policy, Facebook users have more reasons to worry about government and corporate surveillance. Facebook’s subscribers have protested against its real name policy. Yet Facebook’s position on demanding real names remains firm. The track record of Facebook’s privacy practice is problematic, although they repeatedly assert that users have control of their data, including how much Facebook uses the users’ data they collected for targeted advertising. This paper argues that users lose much of their control so long as Facebook continues to insist on its real name policy, because there is already so much information about us in our names. This paper addresses why Facebook should reconsider their position and allow pseudonymous usernames, and discusses the potential legal grounds to challenge Facebook’s real name policy under EU GDPR’s new regulatory regime.
什么是在一个名字- Facebook的实名政策和用户隐私
人们越来越担心社交媒体助长的监控社会的危险,在这种社会中,个人自愿将自己的数据交给服务提供商。在主要的社交媒体服务中,Facebook之所以脱颖而出,不仅是因为它的市场份额,还因为它坚持严格的实名制政策。订阅者必须在平台上以真实姓名注册用户名。由于这项政策,Facebook用户有更多理由担心政府和企业的监控。Facebook的用户抗议其实名制政策。然而,Facebook在要求实名制方面的立场依然坚定。Facebook的隐私实践记录是有问题的,尽管他们一再声称用户可以控制自己的数据,包括Facebook使用他们收集的用户数据进行定向广告的程度。本文认为,只要Facebook继续坚持其实名制政策,用户就会失去很多控制权,因为我们的名字中已经包含了太多关于我们的信息。本文阐述了为什么Facebook应该重新考虑自己的立场,允许使用假名用户,并讨论了在欧盟GDPR新监管制度下挑战Facebook实名政策的潜在法律依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信