Financial Attention and the Disposition Effect

Nicolas Dierick, Dries Heyman, Koen Inghelbrecht, Hannes Stieperaere
{"title":"Financial Attention and the Disposition Effect","authors":"Nicolas Dierick, Dries Heyman, Koen Inghelbrecht, Hannes Stieperaere","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3141219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Using a novel brokerage dataset covering individual investors’ login and stock trading behavior, we investigate the severity of the disposition effect as a function of attention. Our results show that more attentive investors trade less in line with the disposition effect, suggesting a comparative advantage in incorporating information into financial decision making. Furthermore, we find that high attention is related to a stronger tendency to sell moderate losses, as compared to large ones, while low attention increases an investor’s likelihood to sell extreme, rather than moderate, profits. These results are in line with the theory of cognitive dissonance and saliency effects.","PeriodicalId":198417,"journal":{"name":"DecisionSciRN: Stock Market Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DecisionSciRN: Stock Market Decision-Making (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3141219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Abstract Using a novel brokerage dataset covering individual investors’ login and stock trading behavior, we investigate the severity of the disposition effect as a function of attention. Our results show that more attentive investors trade less in line with the disposition effect, suggesting a comparative advantage in incorporating information into financial decision making. Furthermore, we find that high attention is related to a stronger tendency to sell moderate losses, as compared to large ones, while low attention increases an investor’s likelihood to sell extreme, rather than moderate, profits. These results are in line with the theory of cognitive dissonance and saliency effects.
财务关注与处置效应
摘要利用一个包含个人投资者登录和股票交易行为的经纪数据集,研究了处置效应的严重程度作为注意力的函数。我们的研究结果表明,更专注的投资者交易较少符合处置效应,这表明在将信息纳入财务决策方面具有比较优势。此外,我们发现,与大关注度相比,高关注度更倾向于卖出中等损失的股票,而低关注度则增加了投资者卖出极端利润的可能性,而不是中等利润。这些结果符合认知失调和显著性效应的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信