Different Types of ‘Background’ of Illustration-based PowerPoint Slides: Anatomy Teachers’ Preferences and Perceived Influence on Learning

Shafinaz Gazi, K. Shamim
{"title":"Different Types of ‘Background’ of Illustration-based PowerPoint Slides: Anatomy Teachers’ Preferences and Perceived Influence on Learning","authors":"Shafinaz Gazi, K. Shamim","doi":"10.53339/aimdr.2022.8.3.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Teachers are often in dilemma on how to use illustrations effectively in teaching Anatomy using multimedia (for e.g., PowerPoint) slides. ‘Background’ is an important element for creating illustration-based PowerPoint slides but is often overlooked when designing such slides. Some general guidelines on the PowerPoint slide background for presenting textual materials are available, but guidelines on the background for presenting illustrations in PowerPoint slides are almost nil. This descriptive type of observational study was part of a broader research that was designed to assess the preferences of Bangladeshi Anatomy teachers towards different types of background of illustration-based PowerPoint slides and their perceived influence on learning.Material & Methods:A survey was conducted among 39 Anatomy teachers from Bangladesh. Seven PowerPoint slides with one same pair of Neuroanatomy illustrations but seven different types of background dealing with the following characteristics were shown to them to collect their preferences and perceived influence on learning: White/Light-coloured homogeneous/Dark-coloured homogeneous; Slightly decorated/Heavily decorated; Related to subject/Not related to subject. Resultsand Conclusion:The survey revealed that most of the participants preferred either light-coloured homogeneous background (around 64%) or white background (around 60%). The least preferred (about 18%) one was the heavily decorated background not related to the subject. Some interesting trends of preference were also observed, including those related to male and female teachers as well as to their length of experience. In most Anatomy teachers’ perceptions, learning would be influenced by using their preferred ‘backgrounds’. Although the results of the present study reveal some insight into the preferences of Anatomy teachers and their perceived influence of different illustration-based PowerPoint slide ‘backgrounds’ on learning, further studies are recommended on larger samples focusing on more specific issues of PowerPoint slide backgrounds before making any conclusive comments on these issues.","PeriodicalId":284999,"journal":{"name":"Annals of International Medical and Dental Research","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of International Medical and Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53339/aimdr.2022.8.3.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Teachers are often in dilemma on how to use illustrations effectively in teaching Anatomy using multimedia (for e.g., PowerPoint) slides. ‘Background’ is an important element for creating illustration-based PowerPoint slides but is often overlooked when designing such slides. Some general guidelines on the PowerPoint slide background for presenting textual materials are available, but guidelines on the background for presenting illustrations in PowerPoint slides are almost nil. This descriptive type of observational study was part of a broader research that was designed to assess the preferences of Bangladeshi Anatomy teachers towards different types of background of illustration-based PowerPoint slides and their perceived influence on learning.Material & Methods:A survey was conducted among 39 Anatomy teachers from Bangladesh. Seven PowerPoint slides with one same pair of Neuroanatomy illustrations but seven different types of background dealing with the following characteristics were shown to them to collect their preferences and perceived influence on learning: White/Light-coloured homogeneous/Dark-coloured homogeneous; Slightly decorated/Heavily decorated; Related to subject/Not related to subject. Resultsand Conclusion:The survey revealed that most of the participants preferred either light-coloured homogeneous background (around 64%) or white background (around 60%). The least preferred (about 18%) one was the heavily decorated background not related to the subject. Some interesting trends of preference were also observed, including those related to male and female teachers as well as to their length of experience. In most Anatomy teachers’ perceptions, learning would be influenced by using their preferred ‘backgrounds’. Although the results of the present study reveal some insight into the preferences of Anatomy teachers and their perceived influence of different illustration-based PowerPoint slide ‘backgrounds’ on learning, further studies are recommended on larger samples focusing on more specific issues of PowerPoint slide backgrounds before making any conclusive comments on these issues.
不同类型的基于插图的PowerPoint幻灯片“背景”:解剖教师的偏好及其对学习的感知影响
背景:如何在多媒体(如PowerPoint)的解剖学教学中有效地使用插图,是教师们经常遇到的难题。“背景”是创建基于插图的PowerPoint幻灯片的重要元素,但在设计此类幻灯片时经常被忽视。关于演示文本材料的PowerPoint幻灯片背景的一些一般指导方针是可用的,但是关于在PowerPoint幻灯片中演示插图的背景的指导方针几乎没有。这项描述性观察性研究是一项更广泛研究的一部分,该研究旨在评估孟加拉国解剖学教师对不同类型的基于插图的PowerPoint幻灯片背景的偏好及其对学习的感知影响。材料与方法:对孟加拉国39名解剖学教师进行调查。研究人员向他们展示了7张带有同一组神经解剖学插图但背景不同的ppt,以收集他们的偏好和对学习的感知影响:白色/浅色同质/深色同质;轻微装饰的/重度装饰的;与主题相关/与主题无关。结果和结论:调查显示,大多数参与者更喜欢浅色的均匀背景(约64%)或白色背景(约60%)。最不受欢迎的(约18%)是与主题无关的重度装饰背景。还观察到一些有趣的偏好趋势,包括与男教师和女教师以及他们的经验长度有关的趋势。在大多数解剖学教师的观念中,学习将受到他们偏爱的“背景”的影响。虽然本研究的结果揭示了解剖学教师的偏好以及他们感知到的不同基于插图的PowerPoint幻灯片“背景”对学习的影响,但在对这些问题做出任何结论性评论之前,建议对更大样本的PowerPoint幻灯片背景进行更具体的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信