Uncertainty and decision making

Anna-leila Williams
{"title":"Uncertainty and decision making","authors":"Anna-leila Williams","doi":"10.4324/9781315143569-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge is always incomplete, yet decisions must be made. This seminar explores uncertainty and its relation to decision making, with a particular focus on the ways that science is applied in order to improve decisions. We will explore the many meanings and origins of uncertainty, using theoretical and case-based approaches. A central theme will be the relation among uncertainty, scientific prediction, and decision making, especially in politically charged issues, for example as related to management of the environment. Ultimately, we will want to understand how effective decisions can be made in the face of inevitable uncertainties. The course will be conducted as a seminar, without formal lectures, and with students expected to participate centrally in not just the class discussion but in framing the issues that stimulate discussion. Obviously, then, it is critical that the week's readings all be completed prior to class. In order to facilitate productive discussion, for each class each student must write a brief (300-500 words) synthesis of key issues, problems, and questions raised by the week's readings. These weekly assignments should also strive to identify connections (contradictions, tensions, etc.) between the individual readings for that week, as well as with readings from previous weeks. In addition to the weekly readings and synopsis, students, working in groups of two, will write a research paper on a current dilemma in public affairs characterized by high uncertainty and urgency to take action. More information on the paper is presented below, after the syllabus. A project proposal is due on Sept. 11, annotated bibliography on Sept. 25, draft of the paper on Oct. 30, and the final paper on Dec. 4. Grading for the course will be based on weekly assignments (33%), class participation (33%), and a research paper (33%).","PeriodicalId":114909,"journal":{"name":"Integrating Health Humanities, Social Science, and Clinical Care","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrating Health Humanities, Social Science, and Clinical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315143569-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Knowledge is always incomplete, yet decisions must be made. This seminar explores uncertainty and its relation to decision making, with a particular focus on the ways that science is applied in order to improve decisions. We will explore the many meanings and origins of uncertainty, using theoretical and case-based approaches. A central theme will be the relation among uncertainty, scientific prediction, and decision making, especially in politically charged issues, for example as related to management of the environment. Ultimately, we will want to understand how effective decisions can be made in the face of inevitable uncertainties. The course will be conducted as a seminar, without formal lectures, and with students expected to participate centrally in not just the class discussion but in framing the issues that stimulate discussion. Obviously, then, it is critical that the week's readings all be completed prior to class. In order to facilitate productive discussion, for each class each student must write a brief (300-500 words) synthesis of key issues, problems, and questions raised by the week's readings. These weekly assignments should also strive to identify connections (contradictions, tensions, etc.) between the individual readings for that week, as well as with readings from previous weeks. In addition to the weekly readings and synopsis, students, working in groups of two, will write a research paper on a current dilemma in public affairs characterized by high uncertainty and urgency to take action. More information on the paper is presented below, after the syllabus. A project proposal is due on Sept. 11, annotated bibliography on Sept. 25, draft of the paper on Oct. 30, and the final paper on Dec. 4. Grading for the course will be based on weekly assignments (33%), class participation (33%), and a research paper (33%).
不确定性和决策
知识总是不完整的,但必须做出决定。本次研讨会探讨不确定性及其与决策的关系,特别关注科学应用于改进决策的方式。我们将使用理论和基于案例的方法探讨不确定性的许多含义和起源。一个中心主题将是不确定性、科学预测和决策之间的关系,特别是在政治问题上,例如与环境管理有关的问题。最终,我们想要了解在面对不可避免的不确定性时如何做出有效的决策。这门课程将以研讨会的形式进行,没有正式的讲座,学生不仅要集中参与课堂讨论,而且要参与构建激发讨论的问题。显然,在上课前完成一周的阅读是至关重要的。为了促进富有成效的讨论,每节课每个学生都必须写一篇简短的文章(300-500字),综合本周阅读中提出的关键问题、问题和疑问。这些每周作业也应该努力找出当周个别阅读材料之间的联系(矛盾、紧张等),以及与前几周的阅读材料之间的联系。除了每周的阅读和摘要外,学生们将以两人一组的形式,写一篇关于当前公共事务困境的研究论文,该困境具有高度的不确定性和采取行动的紧迫性。关于论文的更多信息如下,在教学大纲之后。9月11日提交项目提案,9月25日提交参考书目注释,10月30日提交论文草稿,12月4日提交最终论文。课程评分将基于每周作业(33%)、课堂参与(33%)和研究论文(33%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信