{"title":"Bloom's Normal (2002) and Tarttelin's Golden Boy (2013): Teaching Gender Fluidity Written across Time and Text","authors":"Barbara Lesavoy","doi":"10.5406/FEMTEACHER.26.2-3.0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sex. Sex. Sex. I want to repeat this word three times because the letters s, e, and x, when combined to form the word “sex,” assume magnetic properties. Textually inscribed into course titles, the word “sex” grabs student interest and lures them in droves into women and gender studies classes. I am faculty in women and gender studies (WGST) at a comprehensive public university in western New York. I am a cisidentified1 female and gender nonconforming.2 One of the courses that I regularly teach, titled Sex and Culture, takes up the question of sex and gender identities as understood across geographies of person and place. The course serves the WGST major and minor in addition to several liberal arts student learning outcomes situated under the college General Education rubric. Even though the college boasts a growing WGST major and minor, the majority of the students enroll for General Education credit and are often new to and skeptical of WGST knowledge.3 When considering text adoption for this diversely enrolled course, I tend to examine material across genres of fiction and nonfiction from the humanities and social science disciplines. Questions I repeatedly ask myself include: What writings are new, diversely authored, and progressive to knowledge growth in the WGST field? What texts will be most engaging to students both new to and familiar with WGST? And what materials might students stick with versus abandon because of elevated theoretical discourse? This last question does not suggest that I want to water down or run away from deeper theoretical content, but indicates that a narrative approach to instruction can bring students into the theoretical depth that undergirds WGST knowledge. Like the word “sex,” narrative inscriptions on identity can pull students into the fold of the many theoretical complexities inherent to studying sex and gender identity. Susan Stryker, Judith Butler, and Lauren Berlant, detailed below, write on areas of feminist thought that form the theoretical lens that I use when teaching sex and gender identity. These scholars offer complex concepts that, if reading in isolation or alongside other social science texts, can alienate learners. As a means to Bloom’s Normal (2002) and Tarttelin’s Golden Boy (2013): Teaching Gender Fluidity Written across Time and Text","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/FEMTEACHER.26.2-3.0142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sex. Sex. Sex. I want to repeat this word three times because the letters s, e, and x, when combined to form the word “sex,” assume magnetic properties. Textually inscribed into course titles, the word “sex” grabs student interest and lures them in droves into women and gender studies classes. I am faculty in women and gender studies (WGST) at a comprehensive public university in western New York. I am a cisidentified1 female and gender nonconforming.2 One of the courses that I regularly teach, titled Sex and Culture, takes up the question of sex and gender identities as understood across geographies of person and place. The course serves the WGST major and minor in addition to several liberal arts student learning outcomes situated under the college General Education rubric. Even though the college boasts a growing WGST major and minor, the majority of the students enroll for General Education credit and are often new to and skeptical of WGST knowledge.3 When considering text adoption for this diversely enrolled course, I tend to examine material across genres of fiction and nonfiction from the humanities and social science disciplines. Questions I repeatedly ask myself include: What writings are new, diversely authored, and progressive to knowledge growth in the WGST field? What texts will be most engaging to students both new to and familiar with WGST? And what materials might students stick with versus abandon because of elevated theoretical discourse? This last question does not suggest that I want to water down or run away from deeper theoretical content, but indicates that a narrative approach to instruction can bring students into the theoretical depth that undergirds WGST knowledge. Like the word “sex,” narrative inscriptions on identity can pull students into the fold of the many theoretical complexities inherent to studying sex and gender identity. Susan Stryker, Judith Butler, and Lauren Berlant, detailed below, write on areas of feminist thought that form the theoretical lens that I use when teaching sex and gender identity. These scholars offer complex concepts that, if reading in isolation or alongside other social science texts, can alienate learners. As a means to Bloom’s Normal (2002) and Tarttelin’s Golden Boy (2013): Teaching Gender Fluidity Written across Time and Text
性。性。性。我想重复这个单词三次,因为字母s, e和x,当组合成单词“sex”时,具有磁性。“性”这个词被铭刻在课程名称中,吸引了学生的兴趣,并吸引他们成群结队地进入女性和性别研究课程。我是纽约西部一所综合性公立大学女性与性别研究(WGST)的教员。我是一名性别不符合的女性我经常教授的一门课程名为《性与文化》(Sex and Culture),讨论的是跨地域、跨地域理解的性别和性别认同问题。本课程服务于WGST专业和辅修课程,以及学院通识教育标题下的几个文科学生的学习成果。尽管学院拥有越来越多的WGST专业和辅修专业,但大多数学生注册通识教育学分,并且对WGST知识往往是新手和持怀疑态度在考虑这门招生多样化的课程的文本采用时,我倾向于研究人文和社会科学学科的小说和非小说类材料。我反复问自己的问题包括:在WGST领域,哪些作品是新的、作者多样的、对知识增长有促进作用的?哪些文本对新学生和熟悉WGST的学生最有吸引力?哪些材料会因为理论论述的提升而被学生们坚持而放弃?最后一个问题并不意味着我想淡化或逃避更深层次的理论内容,而是表明,叙事教学方法可以将学生带入支撑WGST知识的理论深度。就像“性”这个词一样,关于身份的叙述性铭文可以把学生拉进研究性别和性别认同所固有的许多理论复杂性的圈子里。苏珊·斯崔克、朱迪思·巴特勒和劳伦·伯兰特,详细介绍了女权主义思想的领域,这些领域构成了我在教授性和性别认同时所使用的理论视角。这些学者提供了复杂的概念,如果单独阅读或与其他社会科学文本一起阅读,可能会疏远学习者。作为布鲁姆的《正常》(2002)和塔特林的《金童》(2013)的一种手段:跨时间和文本的性别流动性教学