Do we know and do we care? Algorithms and Attitude towards Conversational User Interfaces: Comparing Chatbots and Voice Assistants

Sara Irma Parnell, Stefan Klein, Franziska Gaiser
{"title":"Do we know and do we care? Algorithms and Attitude towards Conversational User Interfaces: Comparing Chatbots and Voice Assistants","authors":"Sara Irma Parnell, Stefan Klein, Franziska Gaiser","doi":"10.1145/3543829.3544517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As conversational user interfaces (CUIs) are increasingly integrated into daily life, ethical and societal concerns about integrated content filtering algorithms emerge. In addressing these concerns, it is essential to know how aware and knowledgeable society is of the algorithms it encounters using CUIs and the extent to which this impacts the attitude towards these technologies. In this survey study, we made a first attempt to measure and compare participants’ algorithm awareness of chatbots and voice assistants. Further, we assessed the effect of algorithm literacy on the attitude towards CUIs and possible interaction effects with technology acceptance. Lastly, we compared previous and future usage purposes for chatbots and voice assistants. We found higher algorithm awareness for voice assistants than for chatbots. No correlation between algorithm literacy and attitude towards either chatbots or voice assistants was found. An additional personal-level factor, technology acceptance, did not affect this relationship. The results show that participants preferred using voice assistants for task completion and social purposes over chatbots, while getting information was equally preferred between chatbots and voice assistants. Considering its societal relevance, we want to encourage more research on algorithmic awareness and understanding in the field of CUI and its cognitive and behavioral effects.","PeriodicalId":138046,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3543829.3544517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As conversational user interfaces (CUIs) are increasingly integrated into daily life, ethical and societal concerns about integrated content filtering algorithms emerge. In addressing these concerns, it is essential to know how aware and knowledgeable society is of the algorithms it encounters using CUIs and the extent to which this impacts the attitude towards these technologies. In this survey study, we made a first attempt to measure and compare participants’ algorithm awareness of chatbots and voice assistants. Further, we assessed the effect of algorithm literacy on the attitude towards CUIs and possible interaction effects with technology acceptance. Lastly, we compared previous and future usage purposes for chatbots and voice assistants. We found higher algorithm awareness for voice assistants than for chatbots. No correlation between algorithm literacy and attitude towards either chatbots or voice assistants was found. An additional personal-level factor, technology acceptance, did not affect this relationship. The results show that participants preferred using voice assistants for task completion and social purposes over chatbots, while getting information was equally preferred between chatbots and voice assistants. Considering its societal relevance, we want to encourage more research on algorithmic awareness and understanding in the field of CUI and its cognitive and behavioral effects.
我们知道吗?我们在乎吗?对会话用户界面的算法和态度:比较聊天机器人和语音助手
随着会话用户界面(gui)越来越多地融入日常生活,关于集成内容过滤算法的伦理和社会关注出现了。在解决这些问题时,有必要了解社会对使用gui遇到的算法的意识和知识,以及这在多大程度上影响对这些技术的态度。在这项调查研究中,我们首次尝试测量和比较参与者对聊天机器人和语音助手的算法意识。此外,我们评估了算法素养对用户界面态度的影响,以及与技术接受度可能产生的交互影响。最后,我们比较了聊天机器人和语音助手过去和未来的使用目的。我们发现语音助手的算法意识比聊天机器人更高。算法素养与对聊天机器人或语音助手的态度之间没有相关性。另外一个个人层面的因素,技术接受度,并没有影响这种关系。结果显示,与聊天机器人相比,参与者更喜欢使用语音助手来完成任务和社交,而聊天机器人和语音助手同样更喜欢获取信息。考虑到其社会相关性,我们希望鼓励在CUI领域进行更多关于算法意识和理解及其认知和行为影响的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信