Improving the Accuracy of Intrusion Detection System in the Detection of DoS using Naive Bayes with Lasso Feature Elimination and Comparing with Naive Bayes without Feature Elimination in Wireless Adhoc Network

A.Senthil kumar, T. Nagalakshmi, R. Scholar, Corresponding Author
{"title":"Improving the Accuracy of Intrusion Detection System in the Detection of DoS using Naive Bayes with Lasso Feature Elimination and Comparing with Naive Bayes without Feature Elimination in Wireless Adhoc Network","authors":"A.Senthil kumar, T. Nagalakshmi, R. Scholar, Corresponding Author","doi":"10.1109/ACCAI58221.2023.10199248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to create an InnovativeNaive Bayes with Lasso Feature Elimination Intrusion Detection System (IDS) that uses Naive Bayes without feature elimination (Group 1) and compare its performance to that with Lasso feature elimination (Group 2). NSL-KDD Dataset was used to design the data set and collect an IDS. A total of 38 samples were obtained from each of the 19 groups. The data was analyzed using the SPSS application for statistical analysis. Both groups were subjected to an independent sample T test, which yielded a significance of 0.595 for accuracy. Here p > 0.05. For Group 1, the mean accuracy of Naive Bayes without feature elimination is 0.7432, and for Group 2, the mean accuracy of Lasso feature elimination is 0.6005. Conclusion: The accuracy of the Naive Bayes with Lasso feature elimination is similar to that of the Naive Bayes without feature elimination, but here significance is existing.","PeriodicalId":382104,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI)","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCAI58221.2023.10199248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research is to create an InnovativeNaive Bayes with Lasso Feature Elimination Intrusion Detection System (IDS) that uses Naive Bayes without feature elimination (Group 1) and compare its performance to that with Lasso feature elimination (Group 2). NSL-KDD Dataset was used to design the data set and collect an IDS. A total of 38 samples were obtained from each of the 19 groups. The data was analyzed using the SPSS application for statistical analysis. Both groups were subjected to an independent sample T test, which yielded a significance of 0.595 for accuracy. Here p > 0.05. For Group 1, the mean accuracy of Naive Bayes without feature elimination is 0.7432, and for Group 2, the mean accuracy of Lasso feature elimination is 0.6005. Conclusion: The accuracy of the Naive Bayes with Lasso feature elimination is similar to that of the Naive Bayes without feature elimination, but here significance is existing.
基于Lasso特征消去的朴素贝叶斯方法提高入侵检测系统DoS检测的准确性,并与无线自组网中不带特征消去的朴素贝叶斯方法进行比较
本研究的目的是创建一个创新贝叶斯与Lasso特征消除入侵检测系统(IDS),该系统使用无特征消除的朴素贝叶斯(组1),并将其性能与Lasso特征消除(组2)进行比较。使用NSL-KDD数据集设计数据集并收集IDS。19组各取38份样本。数据采用SPSS软件进行统计分析。两组都进行了独立样本T检验,其准确性显著性为0.595。这里p > 0.05。对于第1组,未经特征消除的朴素贝叶斯平均准确率为0.7432,对于第2组,Lasso特征消除的平均准确率为0.6005。结论:采用Lasso特征消去的朴素贝叶斯与不采用特征消去的朴素贝叶斯准确率相近,但具有一定的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信