{"title":"Bridging, transition, and stuck-open faults in self-testing CMOS checkers","authors":"S. Millman, E. McCluskey","doi":"10.1109/FTCS.1991.146655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The consequences of bridging, transition, and stuck-open faults in self-testing checkers designed only for single stuck-at faults are examined. A methodology for design that guarantees that the checkers will be self-testing in the presence of bridging, transition and stuck-open faults is established. This methodology is applied to several implementations of self-testing checkers. Simulations confirm that these checkers are self-testing in the presence of bridging, transition, and stuck-open faults. The problems associated with testing the checkers in the presence of non-stuck-at faults and the problems that result from reducing the number of checker outputs from two to one are discussed. It is shown that self-testing checkers designed for stuck-at faults will remain self-testing in the presence of nonclassical faults.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":300397,"journal":{"name":"[1991] Digest of Papers. Fault-Tolerant Computing: The Twenty-First International Symposium","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1991] Digest of Papers. Fault-Tolerant Computing: The Twenty-First International Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1991.146655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Abstract
The consequences of bridging, transition, and stuck-open faults in self-testing checkers designed only for single stuck-at faults are examined. A methodology for design that guarantees that the checkers will be self-testing in the presence of bridging, transition and stuck-open faults is established. This methodology is applied to several implementations of self-testing checkers. Simulations confirm that these checkers are self-testing in the presence of bridging, transition, and stuck-open faults. The problems associated with testing the checkers in the presence of non-stuck-at faults and the problems that result from reducing the number of checker outputs from two to one are discussed. It is shown that self-testing checkers designed for stuck-at faults will remain self-testing in the presence of nonclassical faults.<>