The Opposition of Confucians to Catholicism in the Early Qing Dynasty: Yang Guangxian and Kangxi Calendar Lawsuit (1664-1665)

Ling Xuetao
{"title":"The Opposition of Confucians to Catholicism in the Early Qing Dynasty: Yang Guangxian and Kangxi Calendar Lawsuit (1664-1665)","authors":"Ling Xuetao","doi":"10.1515/jciea-2020-110103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the 3rd and 4th year of the reign of Emperor Kangxi (1664-1665), the world was greatly shaken by a lawsuit that took place in Beijing. The lawsuit was the Kangxi Calendar Lawsuit (Kangxi Calendar Controversy) between the Jesuit priest and astronomer Johann Adam Schall von Bell (Tang Ruo wang 湯若望, 1591-1666) and Confucian writer Yang Guangxian 楊光先 (1597-1669). Yang Guangxian (hereinafter referred to as Yang) openly framed the charges against Schall and obtained secret help from the four regents at the time. Unlike the many intellectuals who criticized Catholicism during the late Ming Dynasty, he fought alone much of the time. Still, he won the case: Schall was thrown into prison and Datongli 大統曆 (The traditional Han Chinese Calendar) was restored. On the surface, the lawsuit appeared to be a dispute regarding the contradiction between the Chinese calendar and western calendar, but in reality, it was a bloody confrontation between two cultures. It is possible to account for the lawsuit on the grounds of culture psychology, national feeling and palace politics, but from a broader perspective, what truly stands out is the wide gap in concepts of life and the world, about which Yang was undoubtedly clear.","PeriodicalId":439452,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cultural Interaction in East Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jciea-2020-110103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the 3rd and 4th year of the reign of Emperor Kangxi (1664-1665), the world was greatly shaken by a lawsuit that took place in Beijing. The lawsuit was the Kangxi Calendar Lawsuit (Kangxi Calendar Controversy) between the Jesuit priest and astronomer Johann Adam Schall von Bell (Tang Ruo wang 湯若望, 1591-1666) and Confucian writer Yang Guangxian 楊光先 (1597-1669). Yang Guangxian (hereinafter referred to as Yang) openly framed the charges against Schall and obtained secret help from the four regents at the time. Unlike the many intellectuals who criticized Catholicism during the late Ming Dynasty, he fought alone much of the time. Still, he won the case: Schall was thrown into prison and Datongli 大統曆 (The traditional Han Chinese Calendar) was restored. On the surface, the lawsuit appeared to be a dispute regarding the contradiction between the Chinese calendar and western calendar, but in reality, it was a bloody confrontation between two cultures. It is possible to account for the lawsuit on the grounds of culture psychology, national feeling and palace politics, but from a broader perspective, what truly stands out is the wide gap in concepts of life and the world, about which Yang was undoubtedly clear.
清初儒教对天主教的反对:杨光宪与康熙历法之争(1664-1665)
康熙三、四年(1664-1665),发生在北京的一起诉讼案震惊了世界。这场诉讼是耶稣会牧师和天文学家约翰·亚当·夏尔·冯·贝尔(唐若王,1591-1666)和儒家作家杨光宪(1597-1669)之间的康熙历法诉讼(康熙历法之争)。杨光宪(以下简称杨)公开诬告夏尔,并获得当时四摄政王的秘密帮助。与明末许多批评天主教的知识分子不同,他大部分时间都是独自作战。尽管如此,他还是赢得了这场官司:夏尔被投入监狱,大同历(中国传统的汉历)得以恢复。从表面上看,这是一场关于中国历法和西方历法矛盾的纠纷,但实际上,这是两种文化之间的血腥对抗。从文化心理、民族情感和宫廷政治的角度来解释这场诉讼是可能的,但从更广阔的角度来看,真正突出的是生活观念和世界观念的巨大差距,这一点杨氏无疑是清楚的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信