COVID-Related Risk-Taking: Measuring Compliance with Public Health Recommendations

Rebecca Nurgitz, Carl J. Miller
{"title":"COVID-Related Risk-Taking: Measuring Compliance with Public Health Recommendations","authors":"Rebecca Nurgitz, Carl J. Miller","doi":"10.18848/2156-8960/cgp/v12i02/111-128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Risk-taking behaviors may manifest in multiple ways, including disregarding public health recommendations. In the context of a pandemic, ignoring those recommendations may have devastating consequences for individuals, households, communities, and the healthcare system. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a measure of COVID-related risk-taking (CrRT). Methodology: We investigated CrRT in 318 undergraduate students recruited from a Canadian university. With exploratory factor analysis (EFA), we identified a two-factor structure of CrRT: social non-avoidance and personal protection non-compliance, which is consistent with other related studies. Our scale was validated with results from multiple regression analyses showing that younger age, lower risk perception, lower stress, non-planning, and greater risk tolerance significantly predicted public health risk-taking behaviors, also validated by previous work. Results: Results from our study support the CrRT as a valid and reliable measure of pandemic-specific risk-taking. Conclusion: The CrRT may be of use to other researchers and clinicians as this pandemic continues to evolve and new ones occur.","PeriodicalId":431320,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Health, Wellness, and Society","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Health, Wellness, and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18848/2156-8960/cgp/v12i02/111-128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Risk-taking behaviors may manifest in multiple ways, including disregarding public health recommendations. In the context of a pandemic, ignoring those recommendations may have devastating consequences for individuals, households, communities, and the healthcare system. Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a measure of COVID-related risk-taking (CrRT). Methodology: We investigated CrRT in 318 undergraduate students recruited from a Canadian university. With exploratory factor analysis (EFA), we identified a two-factor structure of CrRT: social non-avoidance and personal protection non-compliance, which is consistent with other related studies. Our scale was validated with results from multiple regression analyses showing that younger age, lower risk perception, lower stress, non-planning, and greater risk tolerance significantly predicted public health risk-taking behaviors, also validated by previous work. Results: Results from our study support the CrRT as a valid and reliable measure of pandemic-specific risk-taking. Conclusion: The CrRT may be of use to other researchers and clinicians as this pandemic continues to evolve and new ones occur.
与covid - 19相关的风险承担:衡量遵守公共卫生建议的情况
冒险行为可能以多种方式表现出来,包括无视公共卫生建议。在大流行的背景下,忽视这些建议可能会对个人、家庭、社区和卫生保健系统造成毁灭性后果。目的:本研究的目的是开发和验证一种衡量covid - 19相关风险(CrRT)的方法。方法:我们对从加拿大一所大学招募的318名本科生进行CrRT调查。通过探索性因子分析(EFA),我们确定了CrRT的双因素结构:社会不回避和个人保护不遵守,这与其他相关研究结果一致。我们的量表通过多元回归分析的结果进行了验证,结果显示,年龄更小、风险感知更低、压力更小、无计划和风险承受能力更强显著地预测了公共卫生冒险行为,这也得到了先前工作的验证。结果:我们的研究结果支持CrRT是一种有效和可靠的流行病特异性冒险措施。结论:随着这次大流行的持续演变和新的大流行的发生,CrRT可能对其他研究人员和临床医生有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信