Continuing Relief of Pain with Long Term Treatment for Osteoporosis with Intravenous Pamidronate

S. Wilson, Sharp Ca, Davie Mwj
{"title":"Continuing Relief of Pain with Long Term Treatment for Osteoporosis with Intravenous Pamidronate","authors":"S. Wilson, Sharp Ca, Davie Mwj","doi":"10.18314/JBO.V4I1.1264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Bisphosphonates are valuable in reducing the incidence of fracture. Side effects limit persistence with oral therapy and long term studies of pain relief are difficult to pursue. Intravenous bisphosphonates offer an alternative treatment to oral bisphosphonates and are tolerated over a longer period. The use of Pamidronate, an intravenously administered bisphosphonate, to benefit pain and reduce fracture incidence in the long term has not been extensively investigated. The study aimed to investigate the effect of Pamidronate on pain, vertebral fracture incidence and Bone Mineral Density over 6 or more years.Methods: Patients were offered intravenous Pamidronate if oral treatment with bisphosphonates or Hormone replacement therapy had failed due to side effects, fractures continued on oral treatment or oesophageal reflux led to cessation of oral treatment. Pain was assessed using the Nottingham health profile; radiographs were used to evaluate vertebral fracture and DXA measured bone mineral density.Results: The primary outcome was the pain domain. Median patient follow up was 9 years. Pain had improved significantly (p = 0.03) and in 68% pain had either improved or remained unchanged. Vertebral fractures occurred in 14% of patients in the first 3 years, 9.5% in years 4-6, but increased in years 7-9 to 27%. Bone mineral density increased in the lumbar spine (p < 0.001) but not at the femoral neck.Conclusions: Pamidronate had a beneficial effect on pain over the period of the study. Vertebral fracture incidence increased after 6 years of Pamidronate, although spine BMD increased significantly.","PeriodicalId":249116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Biology and Osteoporosis","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Biology and Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18314/JBO.V4I1.1264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Bisphosphonates are valuable in reducing the incidence of fracture. Side effects limit persistence with oral therapy and long term studies of pain relief are difficult to pursue. Intravenous bisphosphonates offer an alternative treatment to oral bisphosphonates and are tolerated over a longer period. The use of Pamidronate, an intravenously administered bisphosphonate, to benefit pain and reduce fracture incidence in the long term has not been extensively investigated. The study aimed to investigate the effect of Pamidronate on pain, vertebral fracture incidence and Bone Mineral Density over 6 or more years.Methods: Patients were offered intravenous Pamidronate if oral treatment with bisphosphonates or Hormone replacement therapy had failed due to side effects, fractures continued on oral treatment or oesophageal reflux led to cessation of oral treatment. Pain was assessed using the Nottingham health profile; radiographs were used to evaluate vertebral fracture and DXA measured bone mineral density.Results: The primary outcome was the pain domain. Median patient follow up was 9 years. Pain had improved significantly (p = 0.03) and in 68% pain had either improved or remained unchanged. Vertebral fractures occurred in 14% of patients in the first 3 years, 9.5% in years 4-6, but increased in years 7-9 to 27%. Bone mineral density increased in the lumbar spine (p < 0.001) but not at the femoral neck.Conclusions: Pamidronate had a beneficial effect on pain over the period of the study. Vertebral fracture incidence increased after 6 years of Pamidronate, although spine BMD increased significantly.
长期静脉注射帕米膦酸钠治疗骨质疏松患者疼痛的持续缓解
目的:双膦酸盐在降低骨折发生率方面具有重要价值。副作用限制了口服治疗的持久性,并且很难进行长期的疼痛缓解研究。静脉注射双膦酸盐是口服双膦酸盐的另一种治疗方法,而且耐受性较长。帕米膦酸钠是一种静脉注射的双膦酸盐,从长期来看,它对缓解疼痛和减少骨折发生率的作用尚未得到广泛的研究。该研究旨在研究帕米膦酸钠对疼痛、椎体骨折发生率和骨密度的影响,时间超过6年。方法:如果口服双膦酸盐或激素替代治疗因副作用而失败,口服治疗持续骨折或食管反流导致停止口服治疗,则给予患者静脉注射帕米膦酸盐。使用诺丁汉健康概况评估疼痛;x线片评估椎体骨折,DXA测量骨密度。结果:主要结局为疼痛域。患者中位随访时间为9年。疼痛明显改善(p = 0.03), 68%的患者疼痛改善或保持不变。椎体骨折发生率在前3年为14%,4-6年为9.5%,但在7-9年增加至27%。腰椎骨密度升高(p < 0.001),股骨颈骨密度无升高。结论:帕米膦酸盐在研究期间对疼痛有有益的影响。使用帕米膦酸钠6年后椎体骨折发生率增加,但脊柱骨密度明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信