Agreeing on who is present and who is absent in a synchronous distributed system

F. Cristian
{"title":"Agreeing on who is present and who is absent in a synchronous distributed system","authors":"F. Cristian","doi":"10.1109/FTCS.1988.5321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author describes his system model and failure assumptions by precisely specifying the processor group membership problem. He then gives two protocols for solving this problem. The protocols provide all correct processors with constituent views of the processor group membership. They also guarantee bounded processor failure detection and join processing delays despite any number of performance failures that do not cause network partitioning. The first protocol provides very fast processor failure detection but can require a significant message traffic overhead, even when no failures occur. To reduce this overhead, the author derives the second protocol, which has a (provable) minimal message overhead in the absence of failures but provides a longer failure detection delay and is more complex. He concludes by comparing his approach with other known approaches.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":171148,"journal":{"name":"[1988] The Eighteenth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. Digest of Papers","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"109","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1988] The Eighteenth International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing. Digest of Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1988.5321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 109

Abstract

The author describes his system model and failure assumptions by precisely specifying the processor group membership problem. He then gives two protocols for solving this problem. The protocols provide all correct processors with constituent views of the processor group membership. They also guarantee bounded processor failure detection and join processing delays despite any number of performance failures that do not cause network partitioning. The first protocol provides very fast processor failure detection but can require a significant message traffic overhead, even when no failures occur. To reduce this overhead, the author derives the second protocol, which has a (provable) minimal message overhead in the absence of failures but provides a longer failure detection delay and is more complex. He concludes by comparing his approach with other known approaches.<>
同意同步分布式系统中谁在场,谁不在场
作者通过精确地说明处理器组成员问题,描述了他的系统模型和故障假设。然后他给出了两个解决这个问题的方案。协议为所有正确的处理器提供处理器组成员关系的组成视图。它们还保证了有限的处理器故障检测和连接处理延迟,尽管任何数量的性能故障都不会导致网络分区。第一种协议提供了非常快的处理器故障检测,但即使没有发生故障,也可能需要大量的消息流量开销。为了减少这种开销,作者导出了第二个协议,它在没有故障的情况下具有(可证明的)最小的消息开销,但提供了更长的故障检测延迟并且更复杂。最后,他将自己的方法与其他已知方法进行了比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信