Neoliberalism and personal freedoms during COVID-19

Chalk
{"title":"Neoliberalism and personal freedoms during COVID-19","authors":"Chalk","doi":"10.13169/JGLOBFAUL.8.1.0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"COVID-19 has put the global healthcare system under intense strain, and different healthcare systems have proven to be more effective than others. In particular, the neoliberal countries of the UK and the United States have proven to be the most vulnerable to a global pandemic, however the more socialist countries of Germany and New Zealand have fared much better. The authoritarian regimes of China and Vietnam have fared significantly better, though this has been at the expense of personal freedoms. This article will assess the impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on personal freedoms and human rights by first mapping the impact of COVID-19 on human rights in authoritarian countries, such as China and Vietnam, then moving onto the Asia-Pacific region to examine the more liberal and democratic approaches of Taiwan and New Zealand. Finally, we will analyse the impact of coronavirus on European countries, in particular Germany, and then the United States. Broadly speaking, the least neoliberal countries in the world have come through the pandemic in better shape. The impact of neoliberalism on healthcare systems has resulted in a deterioration of healthcare services. Neoliberal restructuring has generally focused on profit rather than healthcare indicators. This neoliberal approach has had a det-rimental effect both on access to healthcare services and on the quality of what is affordable for many people.","PeriodicalId":167633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Faultlines","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Faultlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/JGLOBFAUL.8.1.0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

COVID-19 has put the global healthcare system under intense strain, and different healthcare systems have proven to be more effective than others. In particular, the neoliberal countries of the UK and the United States have proven to be the most vulnerable to a global pandemic, however the more socialist countries of Germany and New Zealand have fared much better. The authoritarian regimes of China and Vietnam have fared significantly better, though this has been at the expense of personal freedoms. This article will assess the impact of coronavirus (COVID-19) on personal freedoms and human rights by first mapping the impact of COVID-19 on human rights in authoritarian countries, such as China and Vietnam, then moving onto the Asia-Pacific region to examine the more liberal and democratic approaches of Taiwan and New Zealand. Finally, we will analyse the impact of coronavirus on European countries, in particular Germany, and then the United States. Broadly speaking, the least neoliberal countries in the world have come through the pandemic in better shape. The impact of neoliberalism on healthcare systems has resulted in a deterioration of healthcare services. Neoliberal restructuring has generally focused on profit rather than healthcare indicators. This neoliberal approach has had a det-rimental effect both on access to healthcare services and on the quality of what is affordable for many people.
COVID-19期间的新自由主义和个人自由
COVID-19使全球卫生保健系统面临巨大压力,事实证明,不同的卫生保健系统比其他系统更有效。特别是,事实证明,英国和美国等新自由主义国家最容易受到全球流行病的影响,然而,德国和新西兰等更社会主义的国家的情况要好得多。中国和越南的独裁政权表现得好得多,尽管这是以牺牲个人自由为代价的。本文将评估冠状病毒(COVID-19)对个人自由和人权的影响,首先绘制COVID-19对中国和越南等威权国家人权的影响,然后转移到亚太地区,研究台湾和新西兰更自由和民主的做法。最后,我们将分析冠状病毒对欧洲国家的影响,特别是德国,然后是美国。总的来说,世界上新自由主义程度最低的国家以更好的状态度过了这场大流行。新自由主义对医疗系统的影响导致了医疗服务的恶化。新自由主义的重组通常关注利润,而不是医疗指标。这种新自由主义方法对获得医疗服务和许多人负担得起的医疗质量都产生了不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信