Clinical Management of the Hearing Aid Patient

Robert E. Sandlin, P. Sample
{"title":"Clinical Management of the Hearing Aid Patient","authors":"Robert E. Sandlin, P. Sample","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1095202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no general consensus of opinion relating to appropriate hearingaid evaluation procedures and patient management practices among those who are making decisions about hearing-aid devices for the hearing-impaired individual. The plethora of evaluation methods for determining the most appropriate instrumentation gives moot testimony to the range of opinion and practices. Although the literature devoted to hearing aid evaluation procedures is rather considerable, it pales in comparison to the diversity of approaches employed by dispenser and audiologist alike. It is not the intent of this paper to delineate the exact techniques that should be employed in the evaluation process. However, personal conviction dictates that the following concepts should be incorporated into the development of a sound procedure (no pun intended) for determining appropriate amplification. 1. All measurements of patient re-sponse to acoustical stimuli should be made in a calibrated sound field. 2. Tolerance measurement should be undertaken to determine maximum power output (MPO) requirements. 3. Unaided and aided threshold measurements at frequencies of 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz (Hz) should be obtained. 4. Ability to detect differences between frequencies (1/3 octaves) within the 250 to 4000 Hz range should be assessed.","PeriodicalId":364385,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1095202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no general consensus of opinion relating to appropriate hearingaid evaluation procedures and patient management practices among those who are making decisions about hearing-aid devices for the hearing-impaired individual. The plethora of evaluation methods for determining the most appropriate instrumentation gives moot testimony to the range of opinion and practices. Although the literature devoted to hearing aid evaluation procedures is rather considerable, it pales in comparison to the diversity of approaches employed by dispenser and audiologist alike. It is not the intent of this paper to delineate the exact techniques that should be employed in the evaluation process. However, personal conviction dictates that the following concepts should be incorporated into the development of a sound procedure (no pun intended) for determining appropriate amplification. 1. All measurements of patient re-sponse to acoustical stimuli should be made in a calibrated sound field. 2. Tolerance measurement should be undertaken to determine maximum power output (MPO) requirements. 3. Unaided and aided threshold measurements at frequencies of 250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000, and 4000 hertz (Hz) should be obtained. 4. Ability to detect differences between frequencies (1/3 octaves) within the 250 to 4000 Hz range should be assessed.
助听器患者的临床管理
对于合适的助听器评估程序和患者管理实践,在那些为听力受损的人决定是否使用助听器的人之间没有普遍的共识。用于确定最合适的仪器的过多的评估方法为意见和实践的范围提供了毫无意义的证据。尽管文献致力于助听器评估程序相当可观,但与配药者和听力学家采用的方法的多样性相比,它显得苍白。本文的目的不是描述在评估过程中应该采用的确切技术。但是,我个人深信,下列概念应纳入确定适当扩大的健全程序(没有双关语的意思)。1. 所有患者对声刺激反应的测量都应在校准的声场中进行。2. 应进行公差测量以确定最大功率输出(MPO)要求。3.应获得250、500、750、1000、1500、2000、3000和4000赫兹(Hz)频率的独立和辅助阈值测量。4. 应评估在250至4000赫兹范围内检测频率(1/3倍频)差异的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信