{"title":"William T. Sherman and His Officers","authors":"Kristopher A. Teters","doi":"10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469638867.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From beginning to end, Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman remained a reluctant liberator who never saw emancipation as a moral imperative. He had opposed the Emancipation Proclamation at the time it was issued, but by late 1863, Sherman had come to accept the end of slavery as a necessary and inevitable consequence of the war. But even if emancipation made some pragmatic sense, Sherman harbored deep racial prejudices, despised abolitionists, and worried that emancipation issues were looming too large in the Union war effort. During his famed marches in Georgia and the Carolinas, Sherman tried to carry out emancipation on a strictly military basis to benefit the army. He and his officers willingly took in slaves that they could use and discouraged all others. Yet thousands of black refugees had still joined Sherman’s columns. Regardless of what army officers thought, many slaves viewed them as liberators and would not pass up an opportunity to gain freedom. So ironically, the general who was probably least interested in assuming the mantle of a liberator led an army that freed thousands. For many, Sherman’s results mattered more than intentions.","PeriodicalId":184612,"journal":{"name":"Practical Liberators","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Liberators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469638867.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
From beginning to end, Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman remained a reluctant liberator who never saw emancipation as a moral imperative. He had opposed the Emancipation Proclamation at the time it was issued, but by late 1863, Sherman had come to accept the end of slavery as a necessary and inevitable consequence of the war. But even if emancipation made some pragmatic sense, Sherman harbored deep racial prejudices, despised abolitionists, and worried that emancipation issues were looming too large in the Union war effort. During his famed marches in Georgia and the Carolinas, Sherman tried to carry out emancipation on a strictly military basis to benefit the army. He and his officers willingly took in slaves that they could use and discouraged all others. Yet thousands of black refugees had still joined Sherman’s columns. Regardless of what army officers thought, many slaves viewed them as liberators and would not pass up an opportunity to gain freedom. So ironically, the general who was probably least interested in assuming the mantle of a liberator led an army that freed thousands. For many, Sherman’s results mattered more than intentions.
从始至终,威廉·t·谢尔曼(William T. Sherman)少将一直是一个不情愿的解放者,他从未把解放看作是一种道德上的义务。在《解放奴隶宣言》发布时,谢尔曼曾反对该宣言,但到1863年底,谢尔曼已经开始接受奴隶制的终结是战争的必然结果。但是,即使解放奴隶有一些实际意义,谢尔曼也怀有深刻的种族偏见,鄙视废奴主义者,并担心解放奴隶问题在联邦战争努力中显得过于重要。在他著名的乔治亚州和卡罗来纳州的游行中,谢尔曼试图在严格的军事基础上实施解放,以使军队受益。他和他的军官们愿意接受他们可以使用的奴隶,并劝阻其他奴隶。然而,成千上万的黑人难民仍然加入了谢尔曼的纵队。不管军官们怎么想,许多奴隶都视他们为解放者,不会放弃获得自由的机会。所以讽刺的是,这位可能最不愿意承担解放者衣钵的将军领导了一支解放了数千人的军队。对许多人来说,谢尔曼的研究结果比他的意图更重要。