Bridging the Gap between the Deposit Insurance Fund Target Level and the Current Fund Level

Charles Kusaya, J. O'Keefe, Alex Ufier
{"title":"Bridging the Gap between the Deposit Insurance Fund Target Level and the Current Fund Level","authors":"Charles Kusaya, J. O'Keefe, Alex Ufier","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3605487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop a model of deposit insurer choices for pricing deposit insurance, determining the target insurance fund, resolving bank failures and managing insurer investments. The academic literature and law treat these four areas as separate processes. Deposit insurers’ experience, however, shows there are trade-offs between these operations. We use a risk aggregation model (copula) to combine multiple insurer revenue and expense streams. We apply ruin theory, common to insurance literature but not previously used for deposit insurers, to these streams to study target fund estimates and insurer insolvency risk. Our results suggest a target fund for the FDIC (as an example) of $98 billion as of year-end 2019 based on a 99.97 percent confidence level for fund solvency; the official FDIC target fund is $150 billion as of year-end 2019. Next, we test alternative scenarios for achieving a target fund and show changes in probability of ruin and fund capital under various funding strategies a deposit insurer could employ.","PeriodicalId":306152,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3605487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We develop a model of deposit insurer choices for pricing deposit insurance, determining the target insurance fund, resolving bank failures and managing insurer investments. The academic literature and law treat these four areas as separate processes. Deposit insurers’ experience, however, shows there are trade-offs between these operations. We use a risk aggregation model (copula) to combine multiple insurer revenue and expense streams. We apply ruin theory, common to insurance literature but not previously used for deposit insurers, to these streams to study target fund estimates and insurer insolvency risk. Our results suggest a target fund for the FDIC (as an example) of $98 billion as of year-end 2019 based on a 99.97 percent confidence level for fund solvency; the official FDIC target fund is $150 billion as of year-end 2019. Next, we test alternative scenarios for achieving a target fund and show changes in probability of ruin and fund capital under various funding strategies a deposit insurer could employ.
缩小存款保险基金目标水平与现行基金水平的差距
我们开发了一个存款保险公司选择模型,用于存款保险定价,确定目标保险基金,解决银行倒闭和管理保险公司投资。学术文献和法律将这四个领域视为独立的过程。然而,存款保险公司的经验表明,这些业务之间存在权衡。我们使用风险聚合模型(copula)来组合多个保险公司的收入和费用流。我们将破产理论应用于保险文献中,但以前未用于存款保险公司,以研究目标基金估计和保险公司破产风险。我们的结果显示,截至2019年底,FDIC的目标基金(以FDIC为例)为980亿美元,基于基金偿付能力的置信水平为99.97%;截至2019年底,FDIC的官方目标基金为1500亿美元。接下来,我们测试了实现目标基金的替代方案,并显示了在存款保险公司可能采用的各种融资策略下破产概率和基金资本的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信