Changes in accommodation with visual fatigue among digital device users

Sivaletchumi Sigamani, C. Majumder, Sheiladevi Sukumaran
{"title":"Changes in accommodation with visual fatigue among digital device users","authors":"Sivaletchumi Sigamani, C. Majumder, Sheiladevi Sukumaran","doi":"10.51329/mehdioptometry153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Visual fatigue is categorized as a complex phenomenon that decreases visual performance. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in accommodation at different levels of visual fatigue among students of a Malaysian private university using digital devices. \nMethods: In this cross-sectional study, students regardless of sex and ethnicity were included. A comprehensive eye examination was performed. After estimating the level of visual fatigue, the amplitude of accommodation (AA), accommodation facility (AF), and monocular estimation method (MEM) were measured. The visual fatigue questionnaire was filled out by the participants. Participants were categorized based on the visual fatigue scores into low, moderate, and high visual fatigue groups. Moderate and severe visual fatigue groups were combined, as the distribution of participants was uneven across the groups. Accommodation parameters were measured for each group and compared between the two groups, i.e., the low visual fatigue group and the combined moderate to severe visual fatigue group. \nResults: We enrolled a total of 86 students, including 29 (33.72%) men and 57 (66.28%) women, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 22.02 (1.51) years and age ranging from 19 to 26 years. By ethnicity, there were 69 (80.23%) Chinese, five (5.81%) Indian, four (4.65%) Malay, and eight (9.30%) participants from other ethnicities. Most participants were in the low visual fatigue group (54.65%), followed by the severe (25.58%) and moderate (19.77%) visual fatigue groups. AA for both eyes and AF for the right eye differed significantly between the two groups (both P < 0.05). None of the accommodative parameters correlated with visual fatigue (P > 0.05). \nConclusions: Binocular AA and monocular AF significantly differed between the visual fatigue groups, but MEM was comparable. However, none of the accommodative parameters correlated with visual fatigue. These perceived vision dysfunctions could affect the visual skills of students. Therefore, future studies on the relationship between the observed dysfunctions and students’ reading performance are necessary.","PeriodicalId":370751,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypothesis, discovery &amp; innovation in optometry","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypothesis, discovery &amp; innovation in optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51329/mehdioptometry153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Visual fatigue is categorized as a complex phenomenon that decreases visual performance. The aim of the present study was to assess changes in accommodation at different levels of visual fatigue among students of a Malaysian private university using digital devices. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, students regardless of sex and ethnicity were included. A comprehensive eye examination was performed. After estimating the level of visual fatigue, the amplitude of accommodation (AA), accommodation facility (AF), and monocular estimation method (MEM) were measured. The visual fatigue questionnaire was filled out by the participants. Participants were categorized based on the visual fatigue scores into low, moderate, and high visual fatigue groups. Moderate and severe visual fatigue groups were combined, as the distribution of participants was uneven across the groups. Accommodation parameters were measured for each group and compared between the two groups, i.e., the low visual fatigue group and the combined moderate to severe visual fatigue group. Results: We enrolled a total of 86 students, including 29 (33.72%) men and 57 (66.28%) women, with a mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 22.02 (1.51) years and age ranging from 19 to 26 years. By ethnicity, there were 69 (80.23%) Chinese, five (5.81%) Indian, four (4.65%) Malay, and eight (9.30%) participants from other ethnicities. Most participants were in the low visual fatigue group (54.65%), followed by the severe (25.58%) and moderate (19.77%) visual fatigue groups. AA for both eyes and AF for the right eye differed significantly between the two groups (both P < 0.05). None of the accommodative parameters correlated with visual fatigue (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Binocular AA and monocular AF significantly differed between the visual fatigue groups, but MEM was comparable. However, none of the accommodative parameters correlated with visual fatigue. These perceived vision dysfunctions could affect the visual skills of students. Therefore, future studies on the relationship between the observed dysfunctions and students’ reading performance are necessary.
数字设备使用者适应视觉疲劳的变化
背景:视疲劳是一种降低视觉表现的复杂现象。本研究的目的是评估马来西亚一所私立大学使用数字设备的学生在不同视觉疲劳水平下的适应变化。方法:在横断面研究中,不分性别和种族的学生包括在内。进行了全面的眼部检查。在估计视觉疲劳水平后,测量调节幅度(AA)、调节设施(AF)和单眼估计方法(MEM)。视觉疲劳问卷由参与者填写。参与者根据视疲劳评分分为低、中、高视疲劳组。中度和重度视觉疲劳组被合并,因为参与者在各组中的分布是不均匀的。测量各组的调节参数,并比较低视疲劳组和合并中重度视疲劳组的调节参数。结果:共纳入86名学生,其中男性29人(33.72%),女性57人(66.28%),平均(标准差[SD])年龄22.02(1.51)岁,年龄19 ~ 26岁。按种族划分,华人69人(80.23%),印度人5人(5.81%),马来人4人(4.65%),其他种族8人(9.30%)。以轻度视疲劳组(54.65%)居多,其次为重度视疲劳组(25.58%)和中度视疲劳组(19.77%)。两组患者双眼AA、右眼AF差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。所有调节参数均与视疲劳无关(P < 0.05)。结论:双眼AA和单眼AF在视疲劳组间存在显著差异,但MEM具有可比性。然而,所有调节参数都与视觉疲劳无关。这些感知到的视觉功能障碍会影响学生的视觉技能。因此,有必要进一步研究所观察到的功能障碍与学生阅读成绩之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信