Exploring the viability of stochastic computing

Joao Marcos de Aguiar, S. Khatri
{"title":"Exploring the viability of stochastic computing","authors":"Joao Marcos de Aguiar, S. Khatri","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.2015.7357131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, stochastic circuits have received significant attention from academia. Stochastic circuits claim to have a reduced energy consumption at the cost of accuracy and delay. In this paper, we explore the power, delay, energy and area of a stochastic circuit (a stochastic multiplier in particular), and compare these metrics with those of a regular multiplier, implemented using the Sum Of Products (SOP) approach. The SOP based multiplier is implemented both using a Kogge-Stone Adder, as well as a Ripple-Carry adder. Our results show that when the stochastic number generator (SNG) and counter are included in the stochastic multiplier (SM), even for 3 bits, the SM consumes more energy to finish one multiplication than an SOP based regular binary multiplier (RM), and this energy consumption grows exponentially as the number of bits increases. If we only consider the stochastic multiplier cell (SMC, which is simply a 2-input AND gate) and ignore the energy of the SNG and counter, the SMC has a better energy consumption for multiplications up to 12 bits. However, even for 3 bits, the SM (or the SMC) is slower by over 5x compared to the regular multiplier, and this delay increases exponentially as the number of bits increases. The area of the SM (including the area of the SNG and counter) is smaller for multipliers with more than 6 bits.","PeriodicalId":129506,"journal":{"name":"2015 33rd IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 33rd IEEE International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2015.7357131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Recently, stochastic circuits have received significant attention from academia. Stochastic circuits claim to have a reduced energy consumption at the cost of accuracy and delay. In this paper, we explore the power, delay, energy and area of a stochastic circuit (a stochastic multiplier in particular), and compare these metrics with those of a regular multiplier, implemented using the Sum Of Products (SOP) approach. The SOP based multiplier is implemented both using a Kogge-Stone Adder, as well as a Ripple-Carry adder. Our results show that when the stochastic number generator (SNG) and counter are included in the stochastic multiplier (SM), even for 3 bits, the SM consumes more energy to finish one multiplication than an SOP based regular binary multiplier (RM), and this energy consumption grows exponentially as the number of bits increases. If we only consider the stochastic multiplier cell (SMC, which is simply a 2-input AND gate) and ignore the energy of the SNG and counter, the SMC has a better energy consumption for multiplications up to 12 bits. However, even for 3 bits, the SM (or the SMC) is slower by over 5x compared to the regular multiplier, and this delay increases exponentially as the number of bits increases. The area of the SM (including the area of the SNG and counter) is smaller for multipliers with more than 6 bits.
探索随机计算的可行性
近年来,随机电路受到了学术界的广泛关注。随机电路声称以精度和延迟为代价降低了能量消耗。在本文中,我们探讨了随机电路(特别是随机乘法器)的功率,延迟,能量和面积,并将这些指标与使用乘积和(SOP)方法实现的常规乘法器的指标进行了比较。基于SOP的乘法器既使用Kogge-Stone加法器,也使用Ripple-Carry加法器。我们的研究结果表明,当随机乘法器(SM)中包含随机数发生器(SNG)和计数器时,即使是3比特,SM完成一次乘法所消耗的能量也比基于SOP的常规二进制乘法器(RM)多,并且随着比特数的增加,这种能量消耗呈指数级增长。如果我们只考虑随机乘子单元(SMC,它只是一个2输入与门),而忽略SNG和计数器的能量,SMC对于高达12位的乘法具有更好的能量消耗。然而,即使对于3位,SM(或SMC)也比常规乘法器慢5倍以上,并且随着比特数的增加,这种延迟呈指数增长。对于大于6位的乘法器,SM的面积(包括SNG和计数器的面积)较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信