BRAF and MLH1 Analysis Algorithm for the Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome Risk in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients: Evidence-Based Data from the Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases

T. Maloberti, A. De Leo, V. Sanza, L. Merlo, M. Visani, G. Acquaviva, Sara Coluccelli, A. Altimari, E. Gruppioni, Stefano Zagnoni, D. Turchetti, S. Miccoli, M. Fiorentino, A. D’Errico, D. de Biase, G. Tallini
{"title":"BRAF and MLH1 Analysis Algorithm for the Evaluation of Lynch Syndrome Risk in Colorectal Carcinoma Patients: Evidence-Based Data from the Analysis of 100 Consecutive Cases","authors":"T. Maloberti, A. De Leo, V. Sanza, L. Merlo, M. Visani, G. Acquaviva, Sara Coluccelli, A. Altimari, E. Gruppioni, Stefano Zagnoni, D. Turchetti, S. Miccoli, M. Fiorentino, A. D’Errico, D. de Biase, G. Tallini","doi":"10.3390/jmp3030011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several causes may lead to CRC, either extrinsic (sporadic forms) or genetic (hereditary forms), such as Lynch syndrome (LS). Most sporadic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) CRC cases are characterized by the methylation of the MLH1 promoter gene and/or BRAF gene mutations. Usually, the first test performed is the mismatch repair deficiency analysis. If a tumor shows a dMMR, BRAF mutations and then the MLH1 promoter methylation status have to be assessed, according to the ACG/ASCO screening algorithm. In this study, 100 consecutive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of dMMR CRC were analyzed for both BRAF mutations and MLH1 promoter methylation. A total of 47 (47%) samples were BRAF p.V600E mutated, while MLH1 promoter methylation was found in 77 cases (77.0%). The pipeline “BRAF-followed-by-MLH1-analysis” led to a total of 153 tests, while the sequence “MLH1-followed-by-BRAF-analysis” resulted in a total of 123 tests. This study highlights the importance of performing MLH1 analysis in LS screening of BRAF-WT specimens before addressing patients to genetic counseling. We show that MLH1 analysis performs better as a first-line test in the screening of patients with LS risk than first-line BRAF analysis. Our data indicate that analyzing MLH1 methylation as a first-line test is more cost-effective.","PeriodicalId":124426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Pathology","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp3030011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Several causes may lead to CRC, either extrinsic (sporadic forms) or genetic (hereditary forms), such as Lynch syndrome (LS). Most sporadic deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) CRC cases are characterized by the methylation of the MLH1 promoter gene and/or BRAF gene mutations. Usually, the first test performed is the mismatch repair deficiency analysis. If a tumor shows a dMMR, BRAF mutations and then the MLH1 promoter methylation status have to be assessed, according to the ACG/ASCO screening algorithm. In this study, 100 consecutive formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded samples of dMMR CRC were analyzed for both BRAF mutations and MLH1 promoter methylation. A total of 47 (47%) samples were BRAF p.V600E mutated, while MLH1 promoter methylation was found in 77 cases (77.0%). The pipeline “BRAF-followed-by-MLH1-analysis” led to a total of 153 tests, while the sequence “MLH1-followed-by-BRAF-analysis” resulted in a total of 123 tests. This study highlights the importance of performing MLH1 analysis in LS screening of BRAF-WT specimens before addressing patients to genetic counseling. We show that MLH1 analysis performs better as a first-line test in the screening of patients with LS risk than first-line BRAF analysis. Our data indicate that analyzing MLH1 methylation as a first-line test is more cost-effective.
BRAF和MLH1分析算法评价结直肠癌患者Lynch综合征风险:来自连续100例病例分析的循证数据
多种原因可能导致结直肠癌,要么是外在的(散发性形式),要么是遗传的(遗传性形式),如Lynch综合征(LS)。大多数散发性缺陷错配修复(dMMR) CRC病例的特征是MLH1启动子基因甲基化和/或BRAF基因突变。通常,执行的第一个测试是错配修复缺陷分析。如果肿瘤显示dMMR,则必须根据ACG/ASCO筛选算法评估BRAF突变和MLH1启动子甲基化状态。在这项研究中,对100个连续的福尔马林固定和石蜡包埋的dMMR CRC样本进行了BRAF突变和MLH1启动子甲基化分析。47例(47%)BRAF p.V600E突变,77例(77.0%)MLH1启动子甲基化。“brf -follow -by- mlh1分析”流程总共进行了153次测试,而“mlh1 -follow -by- brf分析”序列总共进行了123次测试。本研究强调了在向患者进行遗传咨询之前,在BRAF-WT标本的LS筛查中进行MLH1分析的重要性。我们发现MLH1分析作为一线检测筛查LS风险患者的效果优于一线BRAF分析。我们的数据表明,分析MLH1甲基化作为一线检测更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信