“Just Rules” for a “Religiosity of Simple People”: Devotional Literature and Inquisitorial Trials in Cartagena de Indias (17th–18th Centuries)

Pilar Mejía
{"title":"“Just Rules” for a “Religiosity of Simple People”: Devotional Literature and Inquisitorial Trials in Cartagena de Indias (17th–18th Centuries)","authors":"Pilar Mejía","doi":"10.1163/9789004425736_011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this chapter is to establish a dialogue between the archive of an Inquisition tribunal and the works written, published, translated, abridged, and selected by jurists and theologians in order to explain how to prosecute the different cases, and how to practise the “true” Christian doctrine in daily life. Understanding the activities of the Inquisitorial court is not restricted, then, to what is written in the court’s proceedings, nor are the proceedings themselves strictly limited to references to the tribunal. Rather, I shall show that such proceedings must necessarily be associated to other sources useful for the court’s everyday work. In particular, I shall take into account some leaflets [cartillas] and “small pieces” [obritas] which describe the methods used for instructing people and how “remedies were searched” for the “minor heresies” dealt with at the court. The daily work at this court was not characterised exclusively by prosecutions against the “major heresies” of the Muslim, Jewish or Protestant populations. Rather, it mainly aimed at the practices of people who, in the 17th century of this cosmopolitan Caribbean port, constituted a variegated aggregate of “superstitious” Christians.1 Based on a detailed analysis of the court’s proceedings and reports [relaciones], of the available letters exchanged and the books consulted, we see that the court members needed handbooks and “small pieces” [obritas] to expound in a short, compiled way and in plain language how “true devotions” should be practised without lapsing into the risks of superficial approaches and religious vices.","PeriodicalId":119648,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge of the <i>Pragmatici</i>","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge of the <i>Pragmatici</i>","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004425736_011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to establish a dialogue between the archive of an Inquisition tribunal and the works written, published, translated, abridged, and selected by jurists and theologians in order to explain how to prosecute the different cases, and how to practise the “true” Christian doctrine in daily life. Understanding the activities of the Inquisitorial court is not restricted, then, to what is written in the court’s proceedings, nor are the proceedings themselves strictly limited to references to the tribunal. Rather, I shall show that such proceedings must necessarily be associated to other sources useful for the court’s everyday work. In particular, I shall take into account some leaflets [cartillas] and “small pieces” [obritas] which describe the methods used for instructing people and how “remedies were searched” for the “minor heresies” dealt with at the court. The daily work at this court was not characterised exclusively by prosecutions against the “major heresies” of the Muslim, Jewish or Protestant populations. Rather, it mainly aimed at the practices of people who, in the 17th century of this cosmopolitan Caribbean port, constituted a variegated aggregate of “superstitious” Christians.1 Based on a detailed analysis of the court’s proceedings and reports [relaciones], of the available letters exchanged and the books consulted, we see that the court members needed handbooks and “small pieces” [obritas] to expound in a short, compiled way and in plain language how “true devotions” should be practised without lapsing into the risks of superficial approaches and religious vices.
“淳朴人的宗教虔诚”的“公正规则”:卡塔赫纳的宗教文学与宗教审判(17 - 18世纪)
本章的目的是在宗教裁判所的档案和由法学家和神学家撰写、出版、翻译、删节和选择的作品之间建立对话,以解释如何起诉不同的案件,以及如何在日常生活中实践“真正的”基督教教义。因此,了解调查法院的活动并不局限于法院诉讼程序中所写的内容,诉讼程序本身也不严格限于对法庭的提及。相反,我将表明,这种诉讼必须与对法院日常工作有用的其他来源联系起来。特别是,我将考虑到一些小册子[软骨]和“小片段”[obritas],它们描述了用于指导人们的方法,以及如何为法庭处理的“小异端”“寻找补救办法”。该法庭的日常工作并不仅仅是起诉穆斯林、犹太人或新教人口中的“主要异端”。更确切地说,它主要针对的是17世纪这个国际化的加勒比港口的人们的做法,这些人构成了“迷信”基督徒的混杂群体。1基于对法院诉讼程序和报告(亲属)的详细分析,对现有的交换信件和查阅的书籍的详细分析,我们看到法院成员需要手册和“小片段”(obritas)来简短地阐述,以汇编的方式和通俗易懂的语言,说明“真正的敬礼”应该如何进行,而不会陷入肤浅的方法和宗教恶习的风险中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信