Seismic Risk Management practices in metalliferous mines

Y. Potvin, Johan Wesseloo, G. Morkel, S. Tierney, K. Woodward, D. Cuello
{"title":"Seismic Risk Management practices in metalliferous mines","authors":"Y. Potvin, Johan Wesseloo, G. Morkel, S. Tierney, K. Woodward, D. Cuello","doi":"10.36487/ACG_REP/1952_10_POTVIN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of seismic risks in metalliferous mines operating in developed mining countries such as Australia, Canada, Chile and Sweden has been very successful during the last decade. The occurrence and magnitude of large seismic events in deep mines has continued to increase with mining reaching deeper horizons, yet, injuries and fatalities due to rockbursts remain very rare in these countries. \nAlthough there are many common practices used to manage seismic risks in mines, there is no recognised process to do so. In 2017, Newcrest Mining Ltd, in collaboration with the Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), undertook a benchmarking campaign to document the different seismic risk management practices currently implemented in mines which are considered leaders in this area. Data was gathered from 16 mines operating in five countries, experiencing different degrees of seismicity. Analysis of the data from the benchmarking study led to a better understanding of seismic risk management practices applied in the industry. \nOne of the important outcomes of this project was the development of a flowchart describing in detail a generic seismic risk management process. The process is broken into four different layers of activities: data collection, seismic response to mining, control measures, and seismic risk assessment. \nWithin each layer of activity, there are a number of components, and within each component, there are a number of practices, which have been benchmarked and are discussed in this paper. \nIn addition to providing a road map for managing seismicity in underground metalliferous mines, this work enables users to assess their own practices against standard and advanced practices in the management of seismic risks. A full description of the seismic risk management process is available to the mining industry at https://acg.uwa.edu.au/srmp.","PeriodicalId":213743,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Deep and High Stress Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36487/ACG_REP/1952_10_POTVIN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The management of seismic risks in metalliferous mines operating in developed mining countries such as Australia, Canada, Chile and Sweden has been very successful during the last decade. The occurrence and magnitude of large seismic events in deep mines has continued to increase with mining reaching deeper horizons, yet, injuries and fatalities due to rockbursts remain very rare in these countries. Although there are many common practices used to manage seismic risks in mines, there is no recognised process to do so. In 2017, Newcrest Mining Ltd, in collaboration with the Australian Centre for Geomechanics (ACG), undertook a benchmarking campaign to document the different seismic risk management practices currently implemented in mines which are considered leaders in this area. Data was gathered from 16 mines operating in five countries, experiencing different degrees of seismicity. Analysis of the data from the benchmarking study led to a better understanding of seismic risk management practices applied in the industry. One of the important outcomes of this project was the development of a flowchart describing in detail a generic seismic risk management process. The process is broken into four different layers of activities: data collection, seismic response to mining, control measures, and seismic risk assessment. Within each layer of activity, there are a number of components, and within each component, there are a number of practices, which have been benchmarked and are discussed in this paper. In addition to providing a road map for managing seismicity in underground metalliferous mines, this work enables users to assess their own practices against standard and advanced practices in the management of seismic risks. A full description of the seismic risk management process is available to the mining industry at https://acg.uwa.edu.au/srmp.
金属矿山地震风险管理实践
在过去十年中,澳大利亚、加拿大、智利和瑞典等发达矿业国家经营的金属矿的地震风险管理工作非常成功。随着采矿的深入,深部矿井中大型地震事件的发生和震级不断增加,然而,在这些国家,由于岩爆造成的伤亡仍然非常罕见。尽管有许多常见的做法用于管理矿山的地震风险,但没有一个公认的过程来做到这一点。2017年,Newcrest Mining Ltd与澳大利亚地质力学中心(ACG)合作,开展了一项基准测试活动,记录了目前在该领域处于领先地位的矿山中实施的不同地震风险管理实践。数据来自5个国家的16个矿井,经历了不同程度的地震活动。对基准研究数据的分析有助于更好地理解行业中应用的地震风险管理实践。该项目的重要成果之一是制定了详细描述通用地震风险管理过程的流程图。该过程分为四个不同的活动层:数据收集、采矿地震响应、控制措施和地震风险评估。在每一层活动中,都有许多组件,在每个组件中,都有许多实践,这些实践已经进行了基准测试,并在本文中进行了讨论。除了为管理地下金属矿山的地震活动性提供路线图之外,这项工作还使用户能够根据地震风险管理的标准和先进做法评估自己的做法。有关地震风险管理过程的完整描述可在https://acg.uwa.edu.au/srmp上向采矿业提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信