Plasma-Assisted Combustion Above Atmospheric Pressure: Challenges and Opportunities

D. Lacoste
{"title":"Plasma-Assisted Combustion Above Atmospheric Pressure: Challenges and Opportunities","authors":"D. Lacoste","doi":"10.1109/ICOPS37625.2020.9717741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, combustion enhancement by non-equilibrium plasma discharges has been increasingly investigated. The aim of these studies is to evaluate if electrical discharges can enhance flames by applying an electrical power negligible compared to the thermal power released by the combustion mechanisms. In this context, non-thermal plasmas were successfully used to enhance the flammability limits, increase the burning velocity, improve ignition, facilitate the transition to detonation and control thermo-acoustic instabilities, in various configurations1. However, the vast majority of these studies were carried out at atmospheric pressure, while in real combustion systems, the pressure is usually in the range from 5 to 40 bar. An increase in pressure above atmospheric can impact both the combustion and the discharge processes. The effects of pressure on combustion phenomena are relatively well known, except for the electrical properties of flames. Indeed, while at atmospheric pressure, the concentration of electrons in hydrocarbon flames is known to be about 1010 cm−3, there is no available data at higher pressure. Similarly, the effect of non-equilibrium discharges on combustion properties at pressures above atmospheric are not well documented. In this study, the effect of non-thermal plasmas produced by nanosecond repetitively pulsed (NRP) discharges on the flammability limit of methane-air flames at pressures up to 8 bar is investigated. The NRP discharges are characterized by current and voltage measurements, while the flame stability is assessed by direct visualization performed with a DSLR camera. The results show that NRP discharges can improve the stability of premixed swirl flames at all pressures investigated, even if the ratio of electrical discharge power to flame thermal power is kept as low as 0.7%. It is also observed that the required peak voltage does not increase linearly with increasing the pressure. Based on physical explanations for these results, the challenges and opportunities of plasma-assisted combustion above atmospheric pressure are discussed.","PeriodicalId":122132,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)","volume":"510 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOPS37625.2020.9717741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade, combustion enhancement by non-equilibrium plasma discharges has been increasingly investigated. The aim of these studies is to evaluate if electrical discharges can enhance flames by applying an electrical power negligible compared to the thermal power released by the combustion mechanisms. In this context, non-thermal plasmas were successfully used to enhance the flammability limits, increase the burning velocity, improve ignition, facilitate the transition to detonation and control thermo-acoustic instabilities, in various configurations1. However, the vast majority of these studies were carried out at atmospheric pressure, while in real combustion systems, the pressure is usually in the range from 5 to 40 bar. An increase in pressure above atmospheric can impact both the combustion and the discharge processes. The effects of pressure on combustion phenomena are relatively well known, except for the electrical properties of flames. Indeed, while at atmospheric pressure, the concentration of electrons in hydrocarbon flames is known to be about 1010 cm−3, there is no available data at higher pressure. Similarly, the effect of non-equilibrium discharges on combustion properties at pressures above atmospheric are not well documented. In this study, the effect of non-thermal plasmas produced by nanosecond repetitively pulsed (NRP) discharges on the flammability limit of methane-air flames at pressures up to 8 bar is investigated. The NRP discharges are characterized by current and voltage measurements, while the flame stability is assessed by direct visualization performed with a DSLR camera. The results show that NRP discharges can improve the stability of premixed swirl flames at all pressures investigated, even if the ratio of electrical discharge power to flame thermal power is kept as low as 0.7%. It is also observed that the required peak voltage does not increase linearly with increasing the pressure. Based on physical explanations for these results, the challenges and opportunities of plasma-assisted combustion above atmospheric pressure are discussed.
大气压以上等离子体辅助燃烧:挑战与机遇
在过去的十年中,非平衡等离子体放电增强燃烧的研究越来越多。这些研究的目的是评估放电是否可以通过施加与燃烧机制释放的热功率相比可以忽略不计的电力来增强火焰。在这种情况下,非热等离子体被成功地用于提高可燃性极限,增加燃烧速度,改善点火,促进过渡到爆轰和控制热声不稳定性,在各种配置1。然而,这些研究绝大多数是在大气压力下进行的,而在实际燃烧系统中,压力通常在5到40巴的范围内。高于大气的压力的增加会影响燃烧和排放过程。除了火焰的电学性质外,压力对燃烧现象的影响是相对众所周知的。事实上,在大气压下,已知碳氢化合物火焰中的电子浓度约为1010 cm−3,但在更高的压力下没有可用的数据。同样,非平衡放电对大气压以上燃烧特性的影响也没有很好的文献记载。在这项研究中,研究了纳秒重复脉冲(NRP)放电产生的非热等离子体对压力高达8 bar的甲烷-空气火焰的可燃性极限的影响。通过电流和电压测量来表征NRP放电,而火焰稳定性则通过使用数码单反相机进行直接可视化来评估。结果表明,即使放电功率与火焰热功率之比低至0.7%,NRP放电也能提高预混涡流火焰在所有压力下的稳定性。还观察到,所需的峰值电压不随压力的增加而线性增加。基于对这些结果的物理解释,讨论了大气压以上等离子体辅助燃烧的挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信