Servant Leadership and Its Impact on Ethical Climate

Regan K. Dodd, Rebecca M. Achen, A. Lumpkin
{"title":"Servant Leadership and Its Impact on Ethical Climate","authors":"Regan K. Dodd, Rebecca M. Achen, A. Lumpkin","doi":"10.22543/0733.111.1209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many leaders in intercollegiate athletics are under attack due to an overemphasis on winning and revenue generation. In response, some have recommended a transition to a servant leadership approach because of its focus on the well-being of followers and ethical behaviors (Burton & Welty Peachey, 2013; Welty Peachey, Zhou, Damon, & Burton, 2015). The purpose of this study was to examine athletic directors’ potential demonstration of servant leadership and possible contribution to an ethical climate in NCAA Division III institutions. Participants were 326 athletic staff members from NCAA Division III institutions. Results indicated athletic staff members believed athletic directors displayed characteristics of servant leadership. Athletic department employees perceived athletic directors exhibited servant leadership characteristics of accountability, standing back, stewardship, authenticity, humility, and empowerment most often. Staff members who perceived athletic directors displayed servant leadership characteristics were more likely to report working in an ethical climate. If athletic directors choose to model the characteristics of servantleaders, they could promote more fully the NCAA Division III philosophy of prioritizing the well-being of others, being a positive role model for employees, and fostering ethical work climates within their athletic departments. Examining Athletic Directors’ Demonstration of Servant Leadership and its Contribution to Ethical Climate in NCAA Division III Institutions Athletic directors who lead intercollegiate athletic programs directly influence the lives of hundreds of employees and thousands of student-athletes. Possibly nowhere has this been more impactful than in the 450 institutions holding membership in Division III of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). NCAA Division III is unique with studentathletes comprising an average of 19% of undergraduate student bodies and reaching as high as 50% (Sagas & Wigley, 2014). In alignment with NCAA Division III philosophy, athletic directors should prioritize student-athletes’ academic programs and view athletic participation as integral to students’ overall college experiences (National Collegiate Athletic Association, 2016). Servant leadership, a leadership philosophy focusing on putting the needs of followers first with an emphasis on integrity, stewardship, and strong moral values, aligns well with the NCAA Division III philosophy. This philosophy states, “Colleges and universities in Division III place the highest priority on the overall academic quality of the","PeriodicalId":203965,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Values-Based Leadership","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Values-Based Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22543/0733.111.1209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Many leaders in intercollegiate athletics are under attack due to an overemphasis on winning and revenue generation. In response, some have recommended a transition to a servant leadership approach because of its focus on the well-being of followers and ethical behaviors (Burton & Welty Peachey, 2013; Welty Peachey, Zhou, Damon, & Burton, 2015). The purpose of this study was to examine athletic directors’ potential demonstration of servant leadership and possible contribution to an ethical climate in NCAA Division III institutions. Participants were 326 athletic staff members from NCAA Division III institutions. Results indicated athletic staff members believed athletic directors displayed characteristics of servant leadership. Athletic department employees perceived athletic directors exhibited servant leadership characteristics of accountability, standing back, stewardship, authenticity, humility, and empowerment most often. Staff members who perceived athletic directors displayed servant leadership characteristics were more likely to report working in an ethical climate. If athletic directors choose to model the characteristics of servantleaders, they could promote more fully the NCAA Division III philosophy of prioritizing the well-being of others, being a positive role model for employees, and fostering ethical work climates within their athletic departments. Examining Athletic Directors’ Demonstration of Servant Leadership and its Contribution to Ethical Climate in NCAA Division III Institutions Athletic directors who lead intercollegiate athletic programs directly influence the lives of hundreds of employees and thousands of student-athletes. Possibly nowhere has this been more impactful than in the 450 institutions holding membership in Division III of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). NCAA Division III is unique with studentathletes comprising an average of 19% of undergraduate student bodies and reaching as high as 50% (Sagas & Wigley, 2014). In alignment with NCAA Division III philosophy, athletic directors should prioritize student-athletes’ academic programs and view athletic participation as integral to students’ overall college experiences (National Collegiate Athletic Association, 2016). Servant leadership, a leadership philosophy focusing on putting the needs of followers first with an emphasis on integrity, stewardship, and strong moral values, aligns well with the NCAA Division III philosophy. This philosophy states, “Colleges and universities in Division III place the highest priority on the overall academic quality of the
公仆式领导及其对道德氛围的影响
许多校际体育运动的领导者由于过分强调获胜和创收而受到攻击。作为回应,一些人建议过渡到仆人式领导方法,因为它关注追随者的福祉和道德行为(Burton & Welty Peachey, 2013;Welty Peachey, Zhou, Damon, & Burton, 2015)。本研究的目的是检查体育主管的潜在示范服务型领导和可能的贡献在NCAA三级机构的道德氛围。参与者是来自NCAA三级院校的326名体育工作人员。结果表明,体育工作人员认为体育主管表现出服务型领导的特点。体育部门员工认为体育主管最常表现出仆人式领导特征,包括问责、退后、管理、真实、谦逊和赋权。认为体育主管表现出仆人式领导特征的员工更有可能在道德氛围中工作。如果体育主管选择以仆人式领导者的特征为榜样,他们可以更充分地推广NCAA第三部门的理念,即优先考虑他人的福祉,成为员工的积极榜样,并在体育部门内培养道德工作氛围。NCAA三级机构体育主管领导校际体育项目,直接影响数百名员工和数千名学生运动员的生活。在全美大学体育协会(NCAA)第三分会的450所院校中,这可能是最具影响力的。NCAA第三赛区的独特之处在于,学生运动员平均占本科生总数的19%,最高可达50% (Sagas & Wigley, 2014)。根据NCAA第三部门的理念,体育主管应该优先考虑学生运动员的学术课程,并将体育参与视为学生整体大学经历的一部分(全国大学体育协会,2016年)。仆人式领导是一种领导哲学,侧重于将追随者的需求放在首位,强调诚信、管理和强烈的道德价值观,与NCAA第三赛区的哲学非常吻合。这一理念表明,“第三地区的学院和大学把整体学术质量放在首位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信