The Devolutionary Nature of Platoʼs Metaphysics Compared to Egyptian Religion, Proof of an Egyptian System of Mystery and of Grecian Origin of Speculative Philosophy

Kiatezua Lubanzadio Luyaluka
{"title":"The Devolutionary Nature of Platoʼs Metaphysics Compared to Egyptian Religion, Proof of an Egyptian System of Mystery and of Grecian Origin of Speculative Philosophy","authors":"Kiatezua Lubanzadio Luyaluka","doi":"10.30958/ajha.7-3-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate about the Egyptian origin of Grecian philosophy is waged so far on the ground of historicism and from the generalization of the concept of philosophy. This paper handles the issue on a theological point of view as an answer to the question: did Grecian speculative philosophy originate from ancient Egypt? Through a comparative study, the paper establishes the divergent natures of Egyptian religion and Platoʼs metaphysics. This divergence implies that the genesial events of Grecian speculative philosophy are not transposable on Egyptian knowledge. Moreover, both episteme do not obey equally to the epistemic evolution theorized by Auguste Comte. The paper proves the existence of a corpus of doctrines, in the religion of ancient Egypt, not found in Greece, which constitutes a system of divine mystery. However, owing to the nature of the scientificity of this corpus of religious doctrines and to the nature of their epistemology, the paper sustains that philosophy, as a speculative discipline, could not originate from ancient Egypt.","PeriodicalId":325459,"journal":{"name":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATHENS JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & ARTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30958/ajha.7-3-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The debate about the Egyptian origin of Grecian philosophy is waged so far on the ground of historicism and from the generalization of the concept of philosophy. This paper handles the issue on a theological point of view as an answer to the question: did Grecian speculative philosophy originate from ancient Egypt? Through a comparative study, the paper establishes the divergent natures of Egyptian religion and Platoʼs metaphysics. This divergence implies that the genesial events of Grecian speculative philosophy are not transposable on Egyptian knowledge. Moreover, both episteme do not obey equally to the epistemic evolution theorized by Auguste Comte. The paper proves the existence of a corpus of doctrines, in the religion of ancient Egypt, not found in Greece, which constitutes a system of divine mystery. However, owing to the nature of the scientificity of this corpus of religious doctrines and to the nature of their epistemology, the paper sustains that philosophy, as a speculative discipline, could not originate from ancient Egypt.
柏拉图形而上学与埃及宗教的演化性比较,埃及神秘体系的证明和思辨哲学的希腊起源
迄今为止,关于希腊哲学起源于埃及的争论是基于历史主义和哲学概念的概括。本文从神学的角度来处理这个问题,以回答希腊思辨哲学是否起源于古埃及?通过比较研究,确立了埃及宗教与柏拉图形而上学的不同本质。这种分歧意味着希腊思辨哲学的一般事件不能转置到埃及的知识上。此外,这两种认识并不完全服从孔德的认识演化理论。本文证明,在古埃及的宗教中,存在着一套在希腊没有发现的教义,这些教义构成了一套神圣的神秘体系。然而,由于这些宗教教义的科学性及其认识论的性质,本文认为哲学作为一门思辨学科,不可能起源于古埃及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信