{"title":"Between Institutions and Culture: The UNDP's Arab Human Development Reports 2002-2005","authors":"M. Trebilcock","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1131309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The four Arab Human Development Reports 2002-2005, sponsored by the United Nations Development Program, have attracted more attention and controversy than any other official studies of development in recent years. Celebrated by many Western commentators as a courageous exercise in self-criticism by the Arab authors, the Reports have in turn been denounced by most Arab commentators in the Middle East as an exercise in self-denigration, as scapegoating Arab countries for the legacies of colonialism and Western foreign policy interventions, and as propagating an ethnocentric conception of liberal individualism. The Reports focus on three key themes: building a knowledge society; expanding civil and political freedoms; and women's empowerment. This paper argues that these Reports illuminate an important set of controversies in the broader contemporary development literature, in particular alternative conceptions of the ends of development (e.g., growth versus freedom), and the respective roles of institutions and culture in promoting and shaping developing. The paper is critical of the Reports for marginalizing the importance of economic growth in the development equation and in failing to address the dynamics of the policy reform process, hence risking espousal of an unproductive form of utopianism or universalism.","PeriodicalId":129013,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Law eJournal","volume":"142 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1131309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The four Arab Human Development Reports 2002-2005, sponsored by the United Nations Development Program, have attracted more attention and controversy than any other official studies of development in recent years. Celebrated by many Western commentators as a courageous exercise in self-criticism by the Arab authors, the Reports have in turn been denounced by most Arab commentators in the Middle East as an exercise in self-denigration, as scapegoating Arab countries for the legacies of colonialism and Western foreign policy interventions, and as propagating an ethnocentric conception of liberal individualism. The Reports focus on three key themes: building a knowledge society; expanding civil and political freedoms; and women's empowerment. This paper argues that these Reports illuminate an important set of controversies in the broader contemporary development literature, in particular alternative conceptions of the ends of development (e.g., growth versus freedom), and the respective roles of institutions and culture in promoting and shaping developing. The paper is critical of the Reports for marginalizing the importance of economic growth in the development equation and in failing to address the dynamics of the policy reform process, hence risking espousal of an unproductive form of utopianism or universalism.
由联合国开发计划署(United Nations Development Program)赞助的《2002-2005年阿拉伯人类发展报告》(Arab Human Development report),比近年来任何其他有关发展的官方研究都吸引了更多的关注和争议。许多西方评论家称赞《报告》是阿拉伯作者勇敢的自我批评,而中东的大多数阿拉伯评论家则谴责《报告》是一种自我诋毁,将阿拉伯国家作为殖民主义和西方外交政策干预遗产的替罪羊,并宣传自由个人主义的种族中心主义概念。《报告》聚焦三个关键主题:建设知识型社会;扩大公民和政治自由;以及女性赋权。本文认为,这些报告阐明了更广泛的当代发展文献中的一系列重要争议,特别是关于发展目的的不同概念(例如,增长与自由),以及制度和文化在促进和塑造发展中的各自作用。本文批评《报告》将经济增长在发展等式中的重要性边缘化,未能处理政策改革进程的动态,从而有可能支持一种无益的乌托邦主义或普遍主义形式。