Content and context of volunteering

R. Lindsey, J. Mohan, Sarah L. Bulloch, E. Metcalfe
{"title":"Content and context of volunteering","authors":"R. Lindsey, J. Mohan, Sarah L. Bulloch, E. Metcalfe","doi":"10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447324836.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the content and context of engagement in voluntary action in contemporary Britain. It finds that, over the last 30 years, the pattern of engagement in voluntary action has remained stable, in relation to specific causes supported, and types of tasks undertaken. However, voluntary effort is highly concentrated within a ‘civic core’ of volunteers. The distribution of volunteers is highly stratified; those most likely to engage in formal, organisational roles tend to be those with high levels of economic, social and cultural capital. Using Mass Observation Project (MOP) material the chapter examines the content and context of individual volunteering and finds that MOP writers contribute a complex mix of different voluntary activities. However, many do not immediately recognise their contribution as volunteering, which leads us to question how surveys can successfully capture different types of voluntary engagement. MOP writing also points to the very blurred boundary between informal care and informal volunteering. The chapter finds that MOP writers’ emphasis on familial commitments is a striking feature of their accounts of unpaid work and of voluntary activity; yet this has been largely absent from public discussion about volunteering rates.","PeriodicalId":199990,"journal":{"name":"Continuity and Change in Voluntary Action","volume":"174 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuity and Change in Voluntary Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/POLICYPRESS/9781447324836.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the content and context of engagement in voluntary action in contemporary Britain. It finds that, over the last 30 years, the pattern of engagement in voluntary action has remained stable, in relation to specific causes supported, and types of tasks undertaken. However, voluntary effort is highly concentrated within a ‘civic core’ of volunteers. The distribution of volunteers is highly stratified; those most likely to engage in formal, organisational roles tend to be those with high levels of economic, social and cultural capital. Using Mass Observation Project (MOP) material the chapter examines the content and context of individual volunteering and finds that MOP writers contribute a complex mix of different voluntary activities. However, many do not immediately recognise their contribution as volunteering, which leads us to question how surveys can successfully capture different types of voluntary engagement. MOP writing also points to the very blurred boundary between informal care and informal volunteering. The chapter finds that MOP writers’ emphasis on familial commitments is a striking feature of their accounts of unpaid work and of voluntary activity; yet this has been largely absent from public discussion about volunteering rates.
志愿服务的内容和背景
本章探讨了当代英国参与志愿行动的内容和背景。报告发现,在过去30年中,就所支持的具体原因和所承担的任务类型而言,参与自愿行动的模式保持稳定。然而,志愿工作高度集中在志愿者的“公民核心”中。志愿者的分布高度分层;那些最有可能从事正式的组织角色的人往往是那些拥有高水平经济、社会和文化资本的人。本章使用大众观察项目(MOP)的材料,考察了个人志愿活动的内容和背景,并发现MOP作者贡献了不同志愿活动的复杂组合。然而,许多人并没有立即意识到他们的贡献是自愿的,这让我们质疑调查如何能够成功地捕捉到不同类型的自愿参与。MOP的写作也指出了非正式关怀和非正式志愿服务之间的界限非常模糊。本章发现,MOP作者对家庭承诺的强调是他们对无偿工作和自愿活动的描述的一个显著特征;然而,这在公众关于志愿服务率的讨论中基本上是缺席的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信