Evaluating context-sensitive slicing and chopping

J. Krinke
{"title":"Evaluating context-sensitive slicing and chopping","authors":"J. Krinke","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.2002.1167744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an empirical evaluation of three context-sensitive slicing algorithms and five context-sensitive chopping algorithms, and compare them to context-insensitive methods. Besides the algorithms by Reps et al. (1994, 1995) and Agrawal (2001) we investigate six new algorithms based on variations of k-limited call strings and approximative chopping based on summary information. It turns out that chopping based on summary information may have a prohibitive complexity, and that approximate algorithms are almost as precise and much faster.","PeriodicalId":385190,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2002. Proceedings.","volume":"140 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Software Maintenance, 2002. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.2002.1167744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

We present an empirical evaluation of three context-sensitive slicing algorithms and five context-sensitive chopping algorithms, and compare them to context-insensitive methods. Besides the algorithms by Reps et al. (1994, 1995) and Agrawal (2001) we investigate six new algorithms based on variations of k-limited call strings and approximative chopping based on summary information. It turns out that chopping based on summary information may have a prohibitive complexity, and that approximate algorithms are almost as precise and much faster.
评估上下文敏感的切片和斩切
我们提出了三种上下文敏感的切片算法和五种上下文敏感的切割算法的经验评估,并将它们与上下文不敏感的方法进行比较。除了rep等人(1994,1995)和Agrawal(2001)的算法外,我们还研究了六种基于k限制呼叫字符串变化和基于摘要信息的近似截断的新算法。事实证明,基于汇总信息的切割可能具有令人望而却步的复杂性,而近似算法几乎同样精确,而且速度更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信